Blaine County Courthouse

Blaine County Judicial Building

Last week I found myself in Blaine County doing a land records search. I do not get to Blaine County very often for court related matters. In fact, I have never been to the courthouse in person before. All the hearings I have held there were by phone or videoconference. I walked in and imposed on one of the bailiffs for a tour. He took me to the three courtrooms and showed me around. As plain as it is on the outside, the inside was actually a bit fun. The district court room is in the round, of sorts.

I have tried to remember to take pictures of county courthouses while visiting, or at least nearby. The land record search was actually in the old Blaine County Courthouse, not the Judicial Building.

Blaine County Courthouse

This building was built for Alturas County. Construction began in 1883, and the building opened in the summer of 1884. Alturas County was created in February 1864 from Boise County. Alturas County limits stretched up the Snake River from CJ Strike Dam southwest of Mt. Home to about half way between Roberts and Rexburg, then north to the Montana line and west from there. Here is a map that was hanging in the old Courthouse.

Alturas County Idaho

I grew up in Jerome County and went to school and work in Minidoka County. All part of what was once Alturas County.

Alturas lost territory to the new Custer County in 1881. Then, in February 1889, the territorial legislature split Alturas again. The western portion became the new Elmore County, a strip on the east went to Bingham County, and the southern portion became the new Logan County.

During this time, the area that is now Minidoka, Lincoln, and Jerome Counties was all part of Logan County. The county seat was first in Shoshone, but an election in 1890 moved it to Bellevue, just five miles down the road from Hailey.

In 1891, the new state legislature abolished both Alturas and Logan and tried to replace them with two new counties, Alta and Lincoln, with county seats at Hailey and Shoshone. The Idaho Supreme Court struck the act down that same year because the people in the area being moved never got a vote, and Alturas and Logan were restored. There is some interesting history here, but in short, the split grew out of a long fight between Hailey and Bellevue.

In March 1895, Idaho combined Alturas and Logan back together and renamed it Blaine County. That same month, Lincoln County was created, including what is now Gooding, Jerome, Lincoln, and Minidoka Counties. This creation of Lincoln also recreated the panhandle and the present eastern boundary of Minidoka County.

Gooding and Minidoka Counties were created in January 1913. All of the cities presently in Minidoka County, except Acequia and Burley, were incorporated while the area was still part of Lincoln County. Burley was incorporated in Cassia County in 1909 and grew across the river into Minidoka County in 1960. Acequia was incorporated in Minidoka County in 1952. Eden and Hazelton were part of this Minidoka County. It was this same month that created Power County and carved the eastern portion of the Blaine panhandle as we know it now.

Butte County was created in 1917 carving off the eastern portion of Blaine, leaving the panhandle even more pronounced. Jefferson and Bingham also donated to the new Butte County. In the same legislative session that created Butte County on the east, Camas County was also created on the west, only from Blaine County. These are essentially the current boundaries of Blaine County, apart from a small land exchange with Custer County in 1925.

Jerome County was created in February 1919 claiming eastern portions of Gooding County, basically the south half of remaining Lincoln County, and the western portion of Minidoka County. I only knew Jerome County growing up, just over the border from the present Minidoka County.

This was once the courthouse for the areas I grew up, Paul and Hazelton, now in Minidoka and Jerome Counties. It served them from 1884 until Logan County split off in 1889, and again for a couple of weeks in March 1895, between the creation of Blaine County and Lincoln County.

Blaine County Courthouse

Wilson School, Class of 1938–1947

Wilson School building, Class of 1938-1947

This is a book I received that belonged to my Great Aunt Betty Oram Donaldson. I was not sure exactly what to do with it, other than share it for family history purposes. The photos in the book were not very high quality, but I am replicating them here anyway. Hopefully this history is of value to someone else who has family in the book.

“It’s a Great Life”

It’s the time in life for all of the Wilson School Class of ’47 to stop for a moment and realize that “It is a Great Life.”

We are matured and “aged” to the point that we are willing to accept that we are what we are. We realize that all of us have talents and abilities and that no two of us are alike, but that’s what makes us successful and happy. We are happy when we use our abilities and develop our talents.

In sports and business they often refer to “a level playing field,” meaning that both sides of the competition have equal opportunities. Therefore I believe that in life competition, the only “level playing field” is when we compete with ourselves. Our goal should be to do the very best we can, because no one else has the same talents, or abilities, or past experiences that we as individuals have. It has been said that we are the sum total of our past experiences. I believe our religious freedom and our constitution give us the opportunity to pursue success and happiness.

At the reunion dinner it was noted that all of us were satisfied with our accomplishments in life and most of us were in the service of others by actively volunteering in our churches, schools, civic organizations or other needy causes. Yes! It is true that most of us are involved in golfing, traveling, or other hobbies that we have looked forward to doing while preparing for these Golden Years. The time and resources to pursue and enjoy these activities make it “a Great Life.”

I am proud and honored that I attended Wilson School and associated with all of you there. From that small class we have many success stories and important things that we have done. Each of us has his or her own success story to be proud of whether it’s related to our families, our friends, our activities in church, our civic involvement, our involvement in other special organizations, or our career successes.

It has been said that when we die if we have five close friends that we have been successful in life, If that is true, then all who were part of the Wilson School Class of ’47 are successful individuals because of the friendships that we share today.

May each and every one of us continue to be successful and happy in our daily life, and always remember that it is a Great Life.

— R. B. (Bud) Willey, Class of ’47 Student Body President


History of Wilson School Class, 1938 to 1947

Many of you attended your very first school years in another school. As each one came to Wilson we became friends and so your memories will begin where you started. For a few of us our total elementary school experience was in the old Wilson School and that is why we started this memory book with the first grade.

First Grade, 1938–39

Our first grade teacher was Miss Dorothy Poulsen. She was young and pretty and we loved her. Our first grade class room was upstairs on the southwest corner. It was large with windows on the south and had wood floors. We had tables and chairs, a playhouse, a sand table and a space for a reading circle. We read from Dick and Jane books. We carried our lunches to school and stored them in a screened cabinet in the hallway. Many of us had Snowdrift shortening buckets for lunch pails. That year the front entrance of the school faced north with steps going toward the road. There was no cafeteria. First and second grades were excused at 2:00 p.m. to go home. That year we had two age groups in our class. We met with the children a year older than us. A doctor visited our class and checked our ears and throats. There were about 29 children in our room.

First grade class photo, 1938-39

Second Grade, 1939–1940

Our teacher was Miss Viola Poulsen. Our classroom was upstairs on the southeast corner with windows on the south and east and a fire escape outside. We had desks that year and reading circle space on the east. We learned reading, math and other subjects. The school district closed the Marriott-Slaterville School that year and those children came to our school, so we had one age group of children in our classroom. About this time in the second or third grade we began getting soup for school lunches. They brought buckets of soup to the classrooms and passed enamel bowls and spoons to each student and filled them with soup. That was the forerunner of school lunches. About this time the school was remodeled so that the entrance faced the east and the office was built where the north entrance had been. The bathrooms were downstairs in the basement.

Second grade class photo, 1939-40

Third Grade, 1940–41

Mrs. Folkman was our teacher. Our classroom was the upstairs northeast corner or the southwest corner. There were 29 children in the class.

Third grade class photo, 1940-41

Fourth Grade, 1941–42

These were the war years. Our teacher was Miss Chadwick. Our classroom was the upstairs middle room on the north. These war years were very hard. School was closed in the fall so the older school boys could help harvest farm crops. We went to school on Saturdays a while to make up the time. The older boys were soldiers and were drafted to fight Japan and Germany. Many of our brothers were soldiers. No school pictures were taken during our fourth, fifth and sixth grades because all resources were concentrated on helping the war effort.

Fifth Grade, 1942–43

Our teacher was Miss Vera Shaw. She was a superb teacher. Our classroom was the upstairs northeast corner. About the time of fifth or sixth grades they began school lunches and we had tables in the basement in the hallway. I don’t remember when the cafeteria was built.

Sixth Grade, 1943–44

Our teacher was Vera Shaw again. Our classroom was on the main floor southeast corner. As an activity one day we made butter by shaking cream in a bottle then we each had a cracker with butter on it. We learned reading, math, and spelling etc. It seems like part of this year we had Mrs. McGrath for a music teacher and we made a book of all the old music composers. We bought victory stamps and gave the government the money to help fight the war. A favorite game of the boys was marbles. Each boy took great pride in his collection of marbles and his skill at shooting. The girls played jacks. We had a rubber ball and a set of 12 or so jacks and we would sit on the floor in a circle or around a table and go clear through onseys, twoseys, downseys, under the bridge or over the bridge etc. Another favorite of the girls was jump rope. If you could do “Red Hot Pepper,” or “Double Dutch” without missing you could jump quite a while. To be able to run in and out without missing was a keen skill. The boys played baseball. Another favorite game was “Pop the Whip.” Boys and girls would hold hands “tight” and run in a snake line and try to pop the end person off. We took turns being on the end to be popped off. Another favorite was “Flying Dutchman”. We were in a circle and two people ran around the circle. If your hands were touched you ran to beat the other couple to the empty space. Another favorite in winter time in the gym was four-corner kick.

Seventh Grade, 1944–45

Miss Maude Holmes was our teacher. That year for a very short while we had a Mr. Carter who was unusual. He stole some of our lunch money. Our classroom was on the southwest corner of the main floor. Around this time the school district built the cafeteria on the south of the school. We blessed the food and everyone ate together and we learned dining etiquette. The mashed potatoes and hamburger gravy and chocolate cake were favorites.

Seventh grade class photo, 1944-45

Eighth Grade, 1945–46

Mrs. Woodward was our teacher. Our classroom was on the northwest corner of the main floor. There were 27 in our class. World War II ended and the United States began it’s healing process and the rebuild.

Eighth grade class photo, 1945-46

Ninth Grade, 1946–47

Mr. Leland Reese was our teacher and our classroom was on the northeast corner of the main floor. We were becoming sophisticated adolescents. Mr. Reese taught us first aid. Mr. Wheat Taylor was our principal. Mr. Pettigrew was the orchestra teacher and some of us played instruments. We had basketball and baseball games against the other schools on Fridays.

Wilson School was a safe and healthy environment for children to grow. The teachers respected our childhood and watched over us with kindness. Every year each class in the school participated in a school program. Mr. Arthur Taylor was our principal in the early years. A Mr. Chadwick was principal for a time. Wheat Taylor was principal in our later years and helped prepare us for high school. All in all we had a memorable early school experience and look back at those fun years with fondness.

Ninth grade class photo, 1946-47

Ninth Grade Class of ’47 Reunion in 2000

Drauca Marston Holmes, Lola Taylor Sheffield, Louise Holmes, Marilyn Bowman Garner, Betty Lou Buck Schulze, Emma Ropelato Walling, Nona Flitton Forsgren, Gladys Sorensen Gibson, Lila Stone Harwood, Robert Holmes, Gordon Belnap, Betty May Oram Donaldson, Rudell Willey, Jewel Checketts Atwell.

Reunion photos, Class of 47, 2000

Where Are They Now

GORDON “DUTCH” BELNAP

Gordon Belnap

Married Faye Robins in 1951. Three sons, Rob, Tim, Mike. Eight Grand kids. US Navy: Honorable Discharge. Weber Jr. College 2 years. Utah State: Grad 1958, Masters 1965. Coach, Utah State University 13 years. Athletic Director Weber State University. Faye passed away Aug. 1996. Married Karen Smith Sept. 1997. Hobbies: woodworking, golf, travel, volunteer 2nd grade teacher.

MARILYN BOWMAN GARNER

Marilyn Bowman Garner

I’ve had a good life. I attended Weber College, married Don Butler and had 2 children, Kathy and Gary before leaving Ogden in 1956. We lived in Pocatello, Idaho before moving to Grand Jct. Colorado. During our 15 years in Colorado, I worked for a wholesale drug company and the last year as office manager, bookkeeper for an ophthalmologist. While living there Vickey and Jodi were born. Our son was killed in a car accident in 1968 and in 1971 Don and I were divorced. I moved with my girls to Salt Lake in 1973 where I spent the first 4 plus years as office manager/legal secretary for an attorney. Then I went to work for Salt Lake County. When I retired in 1999, I was fiscal manager for the SLC Public Works Department. I married Clair Garner in June of 2000. We plan to keep up the good life with travel, golf, volunteer work, genealogy and enjoying our 9 grandchildren.

BETTY BUCK SCHULZE

Betty Buck Schulze

When I left high school, I married Marler Williams. A boy, Monte B. was born of that marriage. Marler died 8 months after Monte’s birth. I went to work at HAFB to support myself and Monte. While working at Hill, I completed my schooling at Utah State University. I married Willard Smith. One son, Donald was born of that marriage. After Donald’s birth I returned to work at Hill. I worked as a supervisor for several years, then selected to study under Dr. Fredrick Herzberg, Distinguished Professor of Management from University of Utah. Under Dr. Herzberg’s guidance I completed a Masters Degree Equivalent in Industrial Psychology then taught Organizational Development, Air Force wide. I retired from HAFB with 25 years service. Willard and I traveled for 8 years prior to his death from cancer. I am now married to Hugo Schulze. We are enjoying our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren. I love to golf and play every chance I get. I have played on bowling leagues in the past. I had a wonderful time golfing with my past friends, especially Dutch Belnap, at the Weber High Golf day in 2000.

JEWEL CHECKETTS ATWELL

Jewel Checketts Atwell

I was engaged my senior year, and married Daryl Hendrick on June 19, 1950. We settled in Layton and had 4 girls and 2 boys. I played on the church softball team until I tore the cartilage in my knee, then I helped coach. We moved to Santa Fe, New Mexico and I started my dream of becoming a nurse. I worked 25 years in all areas of nursing, really enjoyed it, and learned a lot. Daryl passed away in June ’68. That was the year I met Gene. I married him in Nov. ’78. He is my best friend, lover and husband. He’s really been good through all the surgeries I’ve had. Gene had 4 children and our families are like one big family, all getting along well. These 21 years have been so happy! We have a total of 10 children, 26 grandchildren and 4 great grandchildren. Gene is now retired from US West [Quest] and we live in Roswell, New Mexico.

JOHN EILANDER [JACK]

John Jack Eilander

Upon my graduation from high school, I married and went into the US Army. After my release from the Army, I went to work for 3 years at the Ogden Arsenal. Subsequently, I was hired by Weber State University, where I retired in 1992 after 38 years of service. I am the father of 6 children, grandfather of 11 grandchildren and great grandfather of 10 great grandchildren.

NONA FLITTON FORSGREN

Nona Flitton Forsgren

After graduating from high school, I got a job at a 5 and dime store for a short time before the opportunity came for me to take employment at Hill Air Force Base as a sheet metal mechanic. I had met my husband, Judd, at a senoir class party. After dating for some time we were married in 1953. I quit work to have our family of 3 daughters. We lived in Ogden and Willard then back to the Ogden area of Kanesville, West Haven. About the time our girls were in school, I again had a chance to return to my old job of riveting. I worked on the F4’s and F16’s. After 22 years of enjoyable service at HAFB, I retired in 1987. I have been busy since, wondering how I had time to work. Judd and I have traveled long and short trips, taken cruises and just the summer of 2001 traveled to Sweden, my husbands long time desire. I have served as Relief Society President in our ward and am enjoying my grandchildren as well as all the family. We have much fun and enjoyment with them. They are the greatest.

ROBERT WILLIAM HOLMES — February 17, 1932

Robert Holmes, young
Robert Holmes, older

(“Where he’s at, there’s mischief” . . . “Bob” . . . likes any back seat . . . not a lone wolf . . . Windy’s always with him . . . they work together . . . that smile! . . . is the key to many locked doors . . . for Bob.)

Born and raised in Wilson, my Father passed away when I was 10, I was left to run the farm, which I did after school and during the summer months.

After graduating from High School I joined the Navy for a 4 year term. During the time I was in the Navy I was in several places in and around Formosa (Taiwan), Korea, Japan and China. It was very educational for me, seeing other countries and other cultures. In the Navy I was assigned to the aircraft carrier, USS BOXER, for eight months we cruised the seas patrolling the waters and land around the foreign countries. The rest of the time I spent in San Diego at Miramar Air Force Base and Point Mugu at Oxnard, California. I learned lots and seen lots during these eight years.

While in Point Mugu, I went a place called Jockey Meads, a resort between Oxnard and the San Fernando Valley, where I met Dorothy Lou Bates. I was invited to church in the Valley and stayed to a fireside at the Bishop’s house. My relationship with Dorothy continued and we were Married on July 17, 1953 in the Logan Temple. We have been blessed with five beautiful daughters, three son-in-laws and twelve grandchildren, six boys and six girls.

After my duty in the Navy, I enrolled in college at Utah State Agricultural College, halfway thru my years there they changed the College to a University, now called Utah State University. I graduated with a BS degree in Industrial Arts Education with a minor in Math after four years. The next summer I started my Masters Degree and a couple years later I finished my Masters in School Administration with a minor in Industrial Arts Education.

I was an Industrials Arts Teacher and taught wood shop for 35 years, retiring in June 1993. I was also a General Contractor for many years building houses and other structures.

I was the Chairman of the Wilson area planning committee for 14 years.

I was on the Weber County Board of Adjustments from 1988 until 1995, chairman of the board from 1990 until 1995. I also served on the Weber County Boundary Commission for one term.

I was the facilitator in organizing and establishing WEST HAVEN CITY – 1990. We became a city in July 1991 and I was the first Mayor serving for three years. While Mayor, I tried to get the city to agree to the sewer and secondary water but no one thought that was important and no one needed it, now, in the year 2001, it is needed and being put in the ground.

Keeping active in politics, I am currently the chairman of the WEST HAVEN SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT. Working with the city makes me feel like I have accomplished a great deal in my life and I enjoy what I am now doing. I am excited about every piece of pipe that is laid in the ground.

LOUISE HOLMES

Louise Holmes

I’m still Louise Holmes, having never changed my name. Following high school I attended Weber College and received an A.S. Degree. Then I attended USAC and received a B.S. Degree. After teaching school for 10 years I went back to what is now USU and received a Masters of Education Degree. After 33 years of teaching school I retired. I have spent part of my time volunteering as a tutor for children ages 6 through high school. I’m still recognized by many of my former students. They always stop for a visit. Traveling has always been fun for me. I’ve taken many tours and have met people who still remain my friends. For the past 23 years I’ve made my home at the Three Fountains Condominiums in North Ogden

JoANNE HOWE GEARY

JoAnne Howe Geary

Since graduation in 1950 my life has been pretty good. I got married in ’52 and had my first boy in ’53, another boy in ’55 and girls in ’59, ’60, and ’66. They are all grown now and in their own homes. We have 11 grandchildren, 6 girls and 5 boys. My husband and I took our children to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico in ’75. We’ve been to Catalina Island off California 4 times. We like to travel when we can to visit our daughter and her family. My husband and I, for the most part, live a very quiet life. Don, my husband, likes gardening and watching video movies. I like to cook, do puzzles and watch quiz shows and video movies, of which we have a large collection. My husband also likes to paint and sketch. Two years ago, after wearing glasses for 56 years, I had my eyes operated on and now I only need glasses for reading small print and driving. We’re going to California, San Bernardino to be exact, in April to see our youngest granddaughter get baptized. We like to travel when we can. We’ll be celebrating our 50th wedding anniversary before the Winter Olympics in 2002. It will be a family affair.

CARMA KLINKE POINDEXTER

Carma Klinke Poindexter

I married Hugh H. Poindexter in Deer Lodge, Montana. He was a rancher and truck driver. I have three daughters, Denise, Kathy; and Ellie, six grandchildren and three great-grandchildren. I have lived in Ogden, Utah; Roy, Utah; Los Angeles, California; and Bountiful, Utah. My home has been in Bountiful, Utah for the past thirty-two years. My husband and I have drove truck together and traveled every state in the U.S. except the New England States and Hawaii. God has been good to me. We are retired Snowbirds now.

DRAUCA MARSTON HOLMES

Drauca Marston Holmes

Drauca and Wayne Holmes were married in October following our graduation. Drauca worked as a secretary while Wayne attended Weber College. They moved to Logan where Wayne graduated as an electrical engineer. Drauca was an Executive Secretary for the Cache Co. Dept of Public Welfare. Wayne was commissioned into the Air Force and they lived in California and New Mexico for the next four years. Drauca was a stay-at-home Mom. They moved to Brigham City in 1959. They have four children and 14 grandchildren. Drauca worked as an Executive Secretary for Thiokol, NASA and the Air Force, performed semi-professionally for six years, graduated from Weber State University in Theater and developed the Heritage Theatre in Perry, Utah, for which she was the Executive Director for 23 years. She and Wayne retired in 1994 and have served an LDS Mission to the Family History Library in SLC.

BETTY MAY ORAM DONALDSON

Betty May Oram Donaldson

My name is Betty May Oram Donaldson. I have lived in the Honeyville and Ogden areas during my younger years. I attended the Honeyville Elementary School and the Wilson Lane School, then the Weber High and Box Elder High Schools. After school I worked as a dental assistant and then a medical assistant until retiring at 62. I married David W. Donaldson in 1953. We built a home in Plain City, Utah and have lived there for 49 years. My hobbies are cooking, working in my flower gardens, fly fishing and all other outdoor sports.

EMMA ROPELATO WALLING

Emma Ropelato Walling

After graduation I went to work for Hill Air Force Base where I met my husband Richard J. Walling. We married Aug. ’53 and I continued working until Dec. ’54 at the birth of our son Dean. Our daughter Terry arrived Jan. ’56. I was able to stay home to rear the children until ’64. Then I went to work at the I.R.S. seasonally until I retired in ’90. My husband passed away in 1972 and my son died in an auto accident in ’93. I sold my home and moved in with my aging parents to help care for them until their deaths in ’96 and ’00. I now plan to visit my family in California and will enjoy traveling to long dreamed of places and spending time with my six grandchildren.

PAUL STOKES

Paul Stokes

I married Mary Jean Miller June 1961 and we have two daughters, Julie Ann, 34 and Lisa Marie, 31. We have two grandchildren, Heather Lynn Beasley 8, and Nicholas Ryan Bronch 17 months. I graduated from Utah State University with a BS degree. I majored in education and minored in Psychology. I taught school for a total of seven years. I also was in the Air Force Reserve for seven years. We moved to Ward, Arkansas in 1965, where we owned and operated a dairy farm for 12 years, then went into the mobile home park business in Jacksonville, Arkansas, and have been renting mobile homes for the past 17 years. We are now semi-retired and have moved back to the farm in Ward. My hobbies are music, dancing and most of all watching the Arkansas Razorbacks football and basketball teams play.

LILA STONE HARWOOD

Lila Stone Harwood

I married Jack Harwood 52 years ago. One year later we had our only child, a son, Keith Harwood. He gave us 4 wonderful granddaughters. Our 3 older girls blessed us with 6 great grandchildren, 3 more girls and 2 boys. My husband retired a few years ago, but still works part time, which is nice for both of us.

GLADYS SORENSEN GIBSON

Gladys Sorensen Gibson

After graduating from Weber College with an Assoc., I married Gary Gibson in the Logan Temple. Our 4 children were born in ’54, ’56, ’58, and ’59, two girls and two boys. Our oldest daughter passed away in June, 1995. Gary traveled for HAFB fixing missile test equipment and I stayed at home with our children. In 1966 I was hired at Pioneer Elementary as librarian, so I went to school with our children. I cataloged the books and set up the library. It was on the job training. I read stories to the school children and taught library science. I worked there 15 years. I love children’s literature. In 1977 I enrolled at Weber State once again and in 1982 graduated with a BS in Elementary Education with a Library Endorsement. I was hired as a teacher at Kanesville Elementary in 1982 and taught second grade 13 years and retired in 1995. I have worked in many chruch positions the most recent being an ordinance worker in the Ogden Temple. I’ve been a member of 3 musical groups and performed as soloist and alto. Gary passed away in Oct., 2001. Now I enjoy making quilts, reading and my family. We have 3 living children, 13 grandchildren, and 2 great grandchildren. I’m trying to keep busy and enjoy life..

LOLA TAYLOR SHEFFIELD

Lola Taylor Sheffield

What Have I been doing the last 50 years? After I graduated from Ogden High School, I took the Cosmetology Course at Weber College and finished after a year. Then I worked at a salon in downtown Ogden. The money was sporadic so when another job offer came at McKesson-Robbins Wholesale Drug House, I took it.

My brother was on a mission in New York and he suggested I come back to Palmyra to see the pageant, which I did. Among the many missionaries involved in the production was one Grant Sheffield from Kaysville, who I met while at the pageant. When he returned from his mission in December he called and came to visit to ask me for a date for New Year’s Eve. We continued to date through the next few months and we were married in June. Shortly after our marriage, Grant was inducted into Uncle Sam’s Service at Fort Ord, California. Our first daughter of three, Vickie, was born while we were at Fort Ord, followed by two more girls, Debbie, and a year later, Sherrie. (Three years after Debbie.)

After Grant graduated from the School of Architecture at the University of Utah, he was hired at Thiokol in the design section. We bought a newly constructed home in Salt Lake- that was another story- commuting back and forth from Salt Lake to Brigham City. Everything went great for five or six years, then Thiokol went down the tube. We were the first wave of the unemployed.

Our neighbor had recently left Utah and went to Tempe, Arizona, and already had set up an interview for himself. So we packed up and went job hunting, hoping to have similar luck. But our trip continued on to California. Another friend we had been close to left a job in California and took a leave of absence when he went to Thiokol in Utah. He took his old job back, with Metropolitan Water District in California, as an engineer. He told us they were hiring and Grant was hired. He retired after 32 years. We bought a home in Brea, California, (Tar Town). Brea means tar in Spanish. (La Brea tar pits in Hollywood or Los Angeles County, not the same.) We lived in an old oil-producing town. Our son Jared was born ten years after our youngest daughter. It took all of us to raise him; he was one busy boy.

We have 8 grandchildren, 5 boys and 3 girls, one little great granddaughter. Most of the children and grandchildren live in Utah. The oldest and the youngest, with 6 of the grandchildren and the great grandchild, live in Utah. Our daughter Sherrie lives in Texas and we have one in California.

We have done a lot of traveling with our children. We have enjoyed traveling with our children to see aunts, uncles, cousins, who were living in Canada, and my sister and their children living in New York. We could travel the country and do lots of visiting and also Mexico was close by and fun to visit too. We continued our traveling after our children flew the nest. Also retiring gave us more time to travel the globe. We have enjoyed spending our vacations in many countries.

We have had a great 50 years and look forward to many more.

RUDELL WILLEY

Rudell Willey

Rudell married Barbara Hadley a few months after graduation on November 1, 1950. They have three children, one boy and two girls. They also have twelve grandchildren.

Rudell worked 35 years for the Southern Pacific Railroad as a brakeman-conductor traveling between Ogden and Carlin, Nevada. During those years Rudell was active in electrical contracting with a Master Electrician License. He was also involved in real estate development with a Real Estate Brokers License and a Commercial Property Managers License.

Rudell has enjoyed hunting in Alaska, Yukon Territories, Canada and the Western United States. fishing in Alaska and Mexico, flying his private airplane the past 34 years in Alaska (four times north of the Artic Circle) Mexico, Guatamala, Jamaica and the Caribbean Islands. Vern Smith accompanied him on many of these trips. Rudell is currently involved in activities in the L.D.S. Church, civic activities, The Quiet Birdmen (an international pilot organization) and Enable Industries, a handicapped facility. Rudell and Barbara now spend a lot of time traveling in their private plane and their motorhome.


In Memory of Our School Friends Who Are Gone But Not Forgotten

DOLORES HIPWELL CHARLTON

Dolores Hipwell Charlton

Dolores was married June 9, 1950 to Wayne Charlton from West Weber. They moved into a small home in West Weber. It caught fire and burned everything, wedding gifts, furniture and all. They then moved up to Wilson into a small home by her mother and dad on 2100. Later they built a nice brick home by her mother and dad. Wayne and Dolores had two children, Brent born in 1952 and LaRee born in 1954. Wayne worked at American Can and also became involved in race horses. He raised a very nice quarter horse from a colt and named her LaRee Bar and took her to Las Alemedas, California and won many races and made good money from her. A Dr. Allred helped Wayne get started in horse racing. They built another brick home on 2550 in Wilson with nice horse barns and then moved to California and raced horses. They did very well. Dolores loved Utah Noodle chow mein and ate a lot of it when they were in Ogden. They bought a ranch in California then sold it and moved to Oklahoma on a ranch. Their son Brent helped Wayne train race horses. Wayne is an expert on knowing the legs of race horses. Dolores was the bookkeeper. Late in 1992 the doctors discovered she had a cancer in her liver. Wayne had expert doctors attend to her but the cancer was too far advanced. They moved back to the house on 2550 and she died June 1, 1993 and was buried in West Weber Cemetery on June 5, 1993. Dolores and Wayne have five grandchildren.

LYNN JENSEN, 1932–1998

Lynn Jensen, military
Lynn Jensen, as a boy

Lynn Jensen served in the U.S. Army for three years. Fifteen months of which he spent in Korea, where he saw combat and was awarded the Bronze Star with V device for valor. He also was awarded the Occ. Medal, a Korean Service Medal with five bronze stars, the Presidential Unit Citation, and the Meritorious Unit Commendation. Following his military service, Lynn spent time in California and Utah. He married Betty Jo and has a stepson, Butch. He divorced and moved to Alaska, where he lived in Chugiak and Eagle River. He had been through engineer and demolition school in Fort Belvoir, Virginia. He was a self-employed mechanic and machinist until he retired in 1996. He died December 2, 1998 from a stroke and was buried in Alaska. He was a very quiet man who would help anyone in need.

ROBERT WAYNE KIRBY

Robert Wayne Kirby

Robert Wayne Kirby was born in Brunswick, Missouri in 1932. In 1941 the family moved to West Ogden. He attended Wilson Elementary and Junior High School for 9 years. He graduated from Weber High School in May of 1950. Bob worked for the Union Pacific Railroad as a fireman/engineer for a period of time. He also worked as a cabinet maker before becoming involved in the drywall trade. In about 1970 he moved with his wife to Elko, Nevada to work in the construction trades. This was a period of increased construction in the Elko, Nevada area due to the newly found gold mines in the surrounding area that brought an influx of workers. Later on Bob worked at the Commercial Hotel in Elko maintaining the gaming machines in the casino there. Bob died in an accident in 1974 in the Elko area and is buried by his parents in the Centerville, Utah Cemetery. He left behind three daughters and one son. Bob will always be remembered for his infectious smile that was always on his face and will be noted among his family, classmates and co-workers for his happy-go-lucky attitude and good-natured personality.

ARTHUR KRANENDONK

Arthur Kranendonk

Art died a very tragic death when his truck caught fire in an accident and burned. Art was married for a very short time and has one daughter. He worked for George Stratford and at the Sugar Factory. He was a very hard, steady worker.

FRANKLIN F. STANGER

Franklin F. Stanger

Served lds mission to Uruguay. Married Mada Lurae Waldron from Malad, Idaho. Father of 7 children, 3 girls and 4 boys. Employed as a salesman. Loved to fly an airplane. Passed away May 8, 1990. Lived in Weber County area all his life.

RUSSELL PACKARD

Russell Packard

When Russell was young, his dad owned the Oil Refinery in West Ogden. He was at the Ogden Rodeo when the announcer said his business was on fire. Everything was destroyed. The family moved to Astoria, Oregon. Russell went in the army and was assigned to guard duty on base in North Africa. His buddy was on guard duty. For a prank Russell kicked the guard shack. The buddy shot Russell dead without checking on who was kicking the shack.

JIM POULOS

Jim Poulos

Married a Greek girl, had one son and one daughter. He was office manager of Texaco Oil Co. in Salt Lake City until the company went out of business. He was stand offish and wanted nothing to do with his family. He was a bartender in Salt Lake City. He died about 15 years ago during open heart surgery, after having heart problems for several years.

SHELDON STAUFFER

Sheldon Stauffer

Sheldon married Colleen Bradshaw sometime between 1952 and 1953. His oldest daughter, Beverly, was born in 1954. His son Gary was born in 1957 and a daughter Shelley was born about 1960. He worked at Hill Field. He died sometime between 1975 and 1985.

MAURICE CHENEY

Maurice Cheney

No information is availabe for Maurice.

We could not find any information or the whereabouts of Vincent McEnerny or Rose Mary Ellsworth or Bill Saunders.

Vincent McEnerny
Rose Mary Ellsworth
Bill Saunders

VERN H. SMITH, August 24, 1932 – February 28, 1981

Vern Smith, young
Vern H. Smith portrait
Vern and Kay Smith

Born in Wilson Lane on August 24, 1932, grew up in Wilson on a farm, attended Wilson School for 9 years, Weber High School for 3 years, attended Weber College from 1950 to 1954, bought first farm in the spring of 1953 in Warden, Washington, served a 2 years L.D.S. Mission in the southern states, starting January 6, 1954.

Vern started farming in the spring of 1956 in Warden, Washington. Met his wife Kay Pratt in Moses Lake, Washington (14 miles from Warden) in 1956. They were married August 15, 1957 in the Salt Lake Temple.

Vern served in the L.D.S. Church as a Bishop, on the High Council, and in the Stake Presidency.

Vern and Kay had 7 children. They had two boys and five girls.

In 1968–1969 Vern was chosen “The Outstanding Young Farmer” in the state of Washington. At the time of his death he was raising beef cattle and farming approximately 1,300 acres of land.

Vern loved to travel, especially in his private plane (Piper Cherokee six) to Mexico.

On February 28, 1981, on the return trip from Mexico, his plane crashed, on Parker Mountain, just north of Escalante, Utah. All aboard, six adults, were tragically killed.

It has been said that, “The common people of the earth are the great people of the earth.” If that is true, then Vern Smith was among the greatest.


Wilson School Faculty

Wilson School Faculty

Row 1—Mrs. Stanford, Miss Shaw, Mrs. Barton, Mrs. Bouwhuis. Row 2—Mrs. Secrist, Mrs. Woodward, Mrs. Sorensen, Miss Holmes. Row 3—Principal, Wheat Taylor, Mr. Pettigrew, Mr. Rhees.


Wilson School 9th Grade Class of ’47 Directory

Directory page
NameAddressPhone
Jewel Checketts Atwell502 N. Mexico Drive, Roswell, New Mexico 88501(505) 624-1751
Gordon Belnap2338 Combe Road, Ogden, Utah 84403(801) 479-7793
Betty Mae Orem Donaldson2558 N. 4100 W., Plain City, Utah 84404(801) 731-3168
Jack Eilander1111 N. 2000 W., Ogden, Utah 84404(801) 731-2916
Nona Flitton Forsgren3703 S. 2700 W., West Haven, Utah 84067(801) 731-0123
Joanne Howe Geary2166 Polk Ave., Ogden, Utah 84401(801) 621-4152
Gladys Sorensen Gibson2294 S. 2300 N., West Haven, Utah 84401(801) 731-0590
Lila Stone Harwood2486 C. Ave., Ogden, Utah 84401—
Robert Holmes2297 W. 2550 S., West Haven, Utah 84401(801) 731-0564
Louise Holmes325 E. 2550 N., North Ogden, Utah 84414(801) 782-7753
Drauca Marsten Holmes75 N. 600 E., Brigham City, Utah 84302(435) 723-6459
Marilyn Bowman Garner7025 Sunburst Circle, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121(801) 943-8912
Carma Klinke PoindexterP.O. Box 373, Clearfield, Utah 84015—
Betty Lou Buck Schulze1111 E. 1150 S., Clearfield, Utah 84015(801) 825-8354
Lola Taylor Sheffield587 East Aspen, Brea, California 62621(714) 671-0335
Paul Stokes2205 Green Acres Road, Jacksonville, Arkansas 72076(501) 982-2232
Emma Ropelato Walling1013 E. 5285 S., Ogden, Utah 84403(801) 479-2743
Rudell Willey1028 E. Brookhaven Dr., Kaysville, Utah 84037(801) 546-8880

(Note: addresses/phone numbers as printed in the original memory book — likely out of date by now, but preserved as a record of where the class was circa 2001–2002.)

In re Juarez

Decision: In re Miguel Juarez and Heidi Lizeth Juarez, Case No. 16-40560-JDP (Bankr. D. Idaho, 28 Mar. 2017)
Judge: Honorable Jim D. Pappas, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Counsel for Debtors: Paul Ross, Idaho Bankruptcy Law, Paul, Idaho
Counsel for Creditor Midland Funding LLC: Thomas D. Smith, Service & Spinner, Pocatello, Idaho; Ryan M. Fawcett, Skinner Fawcett LLP, Boise, Idaho
Chapter 13 Trustee: Kathleen A. McCallister, Meridian, Idaho


Background

Miguel and Heidi Lizeth Juarez filed a Chapter 13 petition on 24 June 2016. Their schedules listed a debt to Synchrony Bank, a CareCredit account ending in 5181, opened in March 2016, in the amount of $3,166, incurred to pay for dental services at Seasons Dental in Burley, Idaho. The account had been charged off in July 2016. The debt was not listed as contingent, unliquidated, or disputed.

On 5 October 2016, Midland Credit Management, Inc. filed a proof of claim as the authorized agent of Midland Funding LLC, asserting a claim of $3,166.09 acquired from Synchrony Bank on that account. The Debtors objected on 11 October 2016, arguing that the claim lacked documentation of the assignment and that Midland Credit was an improper party to collect.

Midland Funding responded by filing an amended proof of claim on 18 October 2016, adding monthly CareCredit/Synchrony Bank account statements, a bill of sale from Synchrony Bank transferring charged-off accounts to Midland Funding, and an affidavit from a Synchrony Bank documentation specialist attesting to the sale. The Debtors did not separately object to the amended claim but set the matter for an evidentiary hearing, held on 21 February 2017. Both parties filed post-hearing briefs.

Two issues were before the Court: whether a creditor affidavit submitted at the hearing should be admitted into evidence, and whether the Debtors’ objection to the amended proof of claim should be sustained.


The Schellig Affidavit

Before the hearing, Midland Funding filed an affidavit from Kelly Schellig, a bankruptcy operations manager at Midland Credit Management, Inc., describing the corporate relationship between Midland Funding and Midland Credit and Midland Credit’s authorization to service accounts on Midland Funding’s behalf. At the hearing, Midland Funding offered the affidavit into evidence. The Debtors objected on three grounds.

Hearsay. The Debtors argued the affidavit contained inadmissible hearsay. Midland Funding responded that the affidavit qualified as a business record under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6). The Court agreed with the Debtors. Schellig was not present for cross-examination, her statements went directly to the contested facts, the connection between Synchrony and Midland Funding and between Midland Funding and Midland Credit, and Midland Funding had not shown the affidavit was prepared in the ordinary course of business rather than in response to the litigation. The business records exception did not apply.

Best Evidence Rule. The Debtors argued that Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 required production of the underlying documents, the purchase agreement and the servicing contract, rather than affidavit testimony describing them. The Court agreed. Schellig’s statements implied the existence of original records that were never produced, and the best evidence rule required either the originals or admissible duplicates, not testimony about what those documents said.

Rule 9017. The Debtors argued that Rule 9014(d) required witness testimony in contested matters to be taken in open court under Civil Rule 43(a), absent party agreement or specific authority otherwise. Midland Funding pointed to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in In re Adair, 965 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1992), which approved a local rule permitting direct testimony by affidavit. The Court distinguished Adair: the local rule in that case required the affiant to be available for live cross-examination, which Midland Funding did not offer here. With no agreement of the parties and no applicable rule or statute authorizing the procedure, submitting affidavit testimony without affording the Debtors an opportunity to cross-examine was impermissible.

The Court excluded the Schellig affidavit on all three grounds.


The Objection to the Amended Proof of Claim

The Debtors’ Position. The Debtors argued the amended proof of claim was not entitled to prima facie validity under Rule 3001(f) because it did not include writings required under Rules 3001(b), 3001(c)(1), and 3001(e)(1) to establish Midland Credit’s authority to file and collect on Midland Funding’s behalf. They further argued that their objection to the original claim constituted a written request under Rule 3001(c)(3)(B), and that Midland Funding’s failure to comply with that request within 30 days defeated any presumption of validity. Finally, even if the amended claim was presumptively valid, the Debtors contended that Miguel Juarez’s hearing testimony, that he had dealt only with Synchrony Bank and had no knowledge of Midland Funding or Midland Credit, was sufficient to rebut that presumption and shift the burden back to Midland Funding to prove its authority to collect.

Midland Funding’s Position. Midland Funding argued that because the claim arose from an open-end revolving consumer credit account, Rule 3001(c)(3) governed and displaced the documentation requirements of Rule 3001(c)(1). The amended proof of claim satisfied each element of the Rule 3001(c)(3)(A) statement: it identified Synchrony Bank as the entity from whom Midland Funding acquired the account, listed Synchrony Bank as the creditor at the date of the last transaction, stated the date of the last transaction as 3 July 2016, left the date of last payment blank as no payment was ever made, and identified 3 July 2016 as the charge-off date. As to rebuttal, Midland Funding argued that the Debtors’ hearing testimony, acknowledging the validity of the debt while offering only unfamiliarity with Midland as their objection, fell well short of raising a genuine factual dispute about who held the claim.

The Court’s Ruling. The Court denied the Debtors’ objection and allowed the claim.

On the documentation question, the Court held that Rule 3001(c)(3) expressly displaces Rule 3001(c)(1) for open-end and revolving consumer credit claims. No copy of any underlying writing is required. The 2012 Advisory Committee notes make this explicit: the five-element statement required by Rule 3001(c)(3)(A) is what enables a debtor to connect a proof of claim to a scheduled debt after the account has been sold, and that purpose is served without requiring assignment documentation. The amended proof of claim satisfied every element of that statement.

On the written request issue, the Court declined to treat the Debtors’ claim objection as the equivalent of a written request under Rule 3001(c)(3)(B). That provision contemplates a formal written demand made directly to the holder of the claim, not a pleading filed with the court. Other bankruptcy courts had consistently so held, and the Court agreed.

On rebuttal, the Court found that Miguel Juarez’s testimony failed to raise a genuine factual dispute about ownership of the claim. To overcome the presumption of prima facie validity, a debtor must allege that the debt is owed to someone else or is not owed at all, not merely that the debtor did not recognize the name of the entity that purchased the account after the petition was filed. Permitting that to suffice would render Rule 3001(c)(3) meaningless. The Debtors’ own schedules, identifying Synchrony Bank, the account number, and a balance of $3,166, constituted evidentiary admissions under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2) that further supported the claim’s validity. The Court noted that the Debtors’ proper avenue, had they genuinely doubted Midland Funding’s authority, was to make a formal written request under Rule 3001(c)(3)(B) for the underlying documentation; if Midland Funding had then failed to comply, that failure could have been offered as evidence to overcome the presumption. That did not happen here.


Why This Matters

1. Rule 3001(c)(3) displaces Rule 3001(c)(1) for revolving and open-end credit claims. A proof of claim for a credit card or revolving account need not attach the underlying credit agreement or assignment documentation. Compliance with the five-element statement in Rule 3001(c)(3)(A) is sufficient for prima facie validity. Objections resting solely on the absence of assignment papers will fail.

2. A claim objection is not a Rule 3001(c)(3)(B) written request. The mechanism for compelling production of underlying documentation is a formal written request made directly to the holder of the claim, not an objection filed with the court. Debtors who want the agreement must ask for it in writing. A creditor’s failure to respond within 30 days to such a request then becomes usable evidence at the objection hearing.

3. Rebutting prima facie validity requires more than unfamiliarity with the claimant. A debtor must raise a genuine factual dispute about who holds the claim, alleging the debt is owed to someone else or is not owed at all. Testimony that the debtor dealt only with the original creditor and does not recognize the debt buyer does not meet that standard.

4. Affidavits submitted in contested matters without the affiant available for cross-examination will be excluded. Rule 9014(d) requires testimony in contested matters to be taken in open court in the same manner as in an adversary proceeding. Without party agreement or specific rule authority, a creditor cannot establish contested facts through affidavit alone. In re Adair is not a refuge unless the affiant is made available for live cross-examination at the hearing.

5. The best evidence rule applies to claims about underlying documents. Where an affiant describes the contents of purchase or servicing agreements without producing them, that testimony will be excluded. The actual documents, or properly authenticated duplicates, must be in the evidentiary record.


Full Decision: Available on PACER, Case No. 16-40560-JDP, Doc. 87 (Bankr. D. Idaho 28 Mar. 2017)
Order Denying Objection: Doc. 88 (Bankr. D. Idaho 28 Mar. 2017)

Bailey – Goodlad Wedding

James Bailey, blacksmith of Sheffield, and Sarah Goodlad, also of Sheffield, were married after banns on 11 December 1826 at the Parish Church of St Peter and St Paul in Sheffield, Yorkshire (now Sheffield Cathedral). James was the son of James Bailey and Mary, of Askham, Nottinghamshire. Sarah was the daughter of John Goodlad and Elizabeth Hammond, of Sheffield.

Bailey – Goodlad marriage record

The couple will make their home in Mattersey, Nottinghamshire.

That is the substance of what the register records. Entry No. 869, page 290, Sheffield Archives & Local Studies, reference PR-138-3-22. The officiating minister was William H Vale, Assistant Minister. Both parties signed their own names, neither made a mark. The witnesses were Nathan Hampson and a second name only partially legible. Both James and Sarah were listed as of “this Parish,” meaning both had established Sheffield residence by the time they married. James was twenty-nine. Sarah was twenty-six.

James Bailey was born in Askham, Nottinghamshire, and baptized there at the parish church on 5 February 1797, the second child of James Bailey and Mary. Some list her last name as White, but no sources verify this information. His father’s trade was blacksmith, and James followed him into it. By the time he appears in Sheffield he is an established tradesman, already old enough to have made his own way in the world. His origins in Askham, a small Nottinghamshire village, and his presence in Sheffield’s industrial economy by his late twenties suggest a young man who went where the work was.

Sarah Goodlad’s story begins further back. She was born on 6 September 1800 in Rotherham, Yorkshire, the second child of John Goodlad and Elizabeth Hammond. She was baptized at the Parish Church of St Mary, Rotherham, on 30 November 1800.

Sarah Goodlad birth record
Another record of Sarah Goodlad’s birth
Third record for Sarah Goodlad’s birth

John Goodlad had been baptized on 28 February 1775 at the Parish Church of St Peter, Conisbrough, the son of William Goodlad and his wife Elizabeth. He was a cabinet maker by trade, and he and Elizabeth Hammond were married on 29 July 1798 at the Parish Church of St Mary, Rotherham. Their witnesses were Thomas Hammond and Sarah Hammond, almost certainly Elizabeth’s family. Elizabeth Hammond was a Yorkshire woman, born about 1776, whose origins beyond her marriage we have not been able to trace.

John Goodlad and Elizabeth Hammond marriage record
John Goodlad and Elizabeth Hammond marriage record – note, they could both sign their names

The Goodlads had five children. Ann, their eldest, was born in 1798. Sarah followed in 1800, baptized at the Parish Church of St Mary, Rotherham. By 1803, the family had moved to Sheffield, and Mary Ann was baptized there on 22 July 1803 at the Parish Church of St Peter and St Paul, Sheffield (now Sheffield Cathedral). Elizabeth was baptized at the same church on 21 November 1806, and John — the youngest — on 2 July 1809, also there.

Elizabeth Goodlad birth record in 1806
John Goodlad birth record in 1809

John Goodlad was a cabinet maker working in Sheffield by at least 1803, when both Mary Ann’s and Elizabeth’s baptism records note his occupation.

Tragedy struck in 1809. John Goodlad was buried on 26 September 1809 at St Peter’s Church, Conisbrough, the parish of his birth, where his parents William and Elizabeth still lived. He was thirty-five years old. The Conisbrough register describes him as “John Goodlad of Sheffield, Son of William & Elizabeth Goodlad of this parish, aged 35 years.” He left five children under the age of eleven, the youngest barely four months old.

John Goodlad burial record

His daughter Elizabeth, three years old, was buried at St Peter’s Church, Conisbrough on 31 December 1809. His infant son John, described in the register as son of “the late John,” was buried at St Peter’s Church, Conisbrough on 28 January 1810, aged four months. Three deaths in four months: a husband, a daughter, an infant son.

Elizabeth Hammond was widowed at approximately thirty-three with three surviving children, Ann, Sarah, and Mary Ann. She remarried on 1 April 1811 at the parish church in Tankersley, Yorkshire, to Enoch Lumb, a Sheffield blacksmith baptized on 28 February 1774 at the Parish Church of St Peter, Woodkirk (now West Ardsley). Together they had three children: William Hammond Lumb, born 1 May 1812, his middle name preserving his mother’s maiden name; Grace, baptized 12 January 1817 at the Parish Church of St Peter, Woodkirk; and Noah, born 1822. William died in Sheffield in 1818 at age six. Noah died there in 1826 at age four. Grace survived, married Robert Frisby at the Parish Church of St Peter and St Paul, Sheffield (now Sheffield Cathedral) on 20 December 1836, and raised seven children in Sheffield through at least 1881. The Frisby descendants share a half-blood line with Mary Ann Bailey Sharp’s descendants through their common mother Elizabeth Hammond, and any researcher who finds their way to the Frisby or Lumb families in Sheffield will find this the connecting thread. Enoch Lumb was buried in Sheffield on 1 January 1835. Elizabeth Hammond survived him as well, living in Sheffield until she was buried at St George’s Church, Sheffield, on 5 September 1849, aged 73. She had outlived two husbands and three of her five Goodlad children. She did not live to see her granddaughter Mary Ann Bailey leave England for America two years later.

Elizabeth Hammond Goodlad Lumb death record

Sarah Goodlad grew up in the household of a widowed and then remarried mother in Sheffield. When she and James Bailey married in 1826 at the Parish Church of St Peter and St Paul, Sheffield, both were described as parishioners of that church, the same building where her younger siblings had been baptized, where her half-sister Grace would marry a decade later. It was the church of the Goodlad family’s Sheffield years, and Sarah married there in the presence of whatever witnesses attended that December day.

After the marriage the Baileys settled in Mattersey, a small village in the Bassetlaw district of Nottinghamshire, roughly thirty miles from Sheffield. James worked as a blacksmith. Their children were baptized at the parish church in Mattersey, their names recorded in the bishop’s transcripts now held at Nottinghamshire Archives:

Mary Ann, born 28 November 1828, baptized 8 December 1828 at Mattersey parish church. She is the thread that connects this family to Sagacity. You can read more about her at the Sharp-Bailey Wedding post.

George, baptized 20 February 1831 at Mattersey parish church, buried 21 October 1834, aged three.

John, baptized 10 February 1833 at Mattersey parish church. He disappears from the record after the christening, absent from the 1841 census, no death recorded, his fate unknown.

George James, baptized 10 December 1834 at Mattersey parish church, seven weeks after his brother George died, buried 14 January 1835, aged five weeks.

Sarah Elizabeth, baptized 11 December 1835 at Mattersey parish church, born less than a year after George James was buried. She appears in the 1841 census at Mattersey, aged five, and then vanishes from the record like her brother John.

Jane, born 19 April 1839, baptized at Mattersey parish church. She also appears in the 1841 census, aged two, and was buried 1 November 1841.

Jane Bailey birth record

Emma Jane, baptized 27 January 1843 at Mattersey parish church.

The 1841 census found the Bailey household at Mattersey: James, age 40; Sarah, age 40; Mary Ann, age 12; Sarah Elizabeth, age 5; Jane, age 2. Two teenage boys, Joseph Baker and George Swinden, both 15, rounded out the household, almost certainly apprentices to James’s smithy. Three children had died by then. Two more, John and Sarah Elizabeth, slipped from the record without explanation.

Sarah Goodlad Bailey died on 7 September 1843 at Mattersey, aged 43. The death was registered in the sub-district of Gringley, East Retford, entry No. 413. The cause given on the certificate was “Visitation of God,” the Victorian designation for sudden or unexplained death. The informant was P R Falkner, Coroner for the County of Nottingham, not James Bailey, which suggests Sarah’s death was sudden enough, or sufficiently uncertain in its cause, to require a coroner’s involvement. Emma Jane had been baptized on 27 January 1843; Sarah died seven and a half months later. The record does not say whether the two events were connected.

Sarah Goodlad Bailey death record

James remarried, to a woman named Harriet, born about 1804 in Green, Yorkshire, whose surname does not appear in any document found so far. By the 1851 census the household at Mattersey consisted of James, age 53, Blacksmith, born Askham, Nottinghamshire; Harriet, age 47, wife, born Yorkshire Green; Emma Jane, age 8, scholar, born Mattersey; and Thomas Parkinson, age 16, apprentice blacksmith, born Clayworth, Nottinghamshire. James had kept a young male apprentice in the house across every census, Joseph Baker and George Swinden in 1841, Thomas Parkinson in 1851, Charles Watkin in 1861. The smithy continued.

1851 British Census

Harriet died between 1851 and 1861. The 1861 census found James, now 63 and widowed, still at Mattersey, still listed as a blacksmith. Emma Jane, 18, kept house for him. Charles Watkin, 18, served as apprentice. It was the same household pattern, grown smaller.

1861 British Census

After 1861 James Bailey disappears from the record. No death certificate has been found. Mary Ann’s Utah death certificate, completed in Plain City in 1913, identifies her father only as “Bailey.” Her children in Plain City knew their grandfather’s trade and his surname but apparently not his given name.

Mary Ann Bailey left Mattersey as a young woman and eventually left England altogether. Her story after Mattersey is told on this site at the Sharp-Bailey Wedding, the Sharp Family History Outreach, and the Sharp-Stoker Wedding.


Sources

England, Nottinghamshire, Church Records, 1578–1937 (Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives) — baptisms of James Bailey (5 February 1797, Askham), George Bailey (20 February 1831, Mattersey), John Bailey (10 February 1833, Mattersey), George James Bailey (10 December 1834, Mattersey), Sarah Elizabeth Bailey (11 December 1835, Mattersey), Emma Jane Bailey (27 January 1843, Mattersey)

England, Yorkshire, Parish Registers, 1538–2016 (Sheffield Archives & Local Studies) — marriage of James Bailey and Sarah Goodlad, 11 December 1826, Parish Church of St Peter and St Paul Sheffield, PR-138-3-22, page 290; baptisms of Mary Ann Goodlad (22 July 1803), Elizabeth Goodlad (21 November 1806), John Goodlad (2 July 1809), all at Parish Church of St Peter and St Paul, Sheffield; marriage of John Goodlad and Elizabeth Hammond, 29 July 1798, Parish Church of St Mary, Rotherham

England, Yorkshire, Bishop’s Transcripts, 1547–1957 (Borthwick Institute for Archives) — baptism of Sarah Goodlad, 30 November 1800, Parish Church of St Mary, Rotherham; baptism of John Goodlad, 28 February 1775, Parish Church of St Peter, Conisbrough; burial of John Goodlad, 26 September 1809, St Peter’s Church, Conisbrough, aged 35; burial of Elizabeth Goodlad, 31 December 1809, St Peter’s Church, Conisbrough; burial of John Goodlad junior, 28 January 1810, St Peter’s Church, Conisbrough

England, Yorkshire, Parish Registers, 1538–2016 (Doncaster Archives) — baptism of John Goodlad, 28 February 1775, Parish Church of St Peter, Conisbrough, page 8, reference P7

General Register Office, London — death certificate of Sarah Bailey, 7 September 1843, Gringley sub-district, East Retford, No. 413, DA 651580; birth certificate of Jane Bailey, 19 April 1839, Gringley sub-district, East Retford, No. 5, BC 917598

England and Wales, Census, 1841 (HO107/851/6) — James Bailey household, Mattersey

England and Wales, Census, 1851 (HO107/2121/86) — James Bailey household, Mattersey; Elizabeth Lumb household, Arundel Street, Sheffield

England and Wales, Census, 1861 (RG09/2412/62) — James Bailey household, Mattersey; Grace Frisby household, Sheffield

England and Wales, Death Registration Index 1837–2007 (FamilySearch) — death of Elizabeth Lumb, 1849, Sheffield, volume 22, page 686

Burials at St George’s Church, Sheffield, September 1849 (Sheffield Archives) — burial of Elizabeth Lumb, 5 September 1849, No. 3630, aged 73

Utah Death Certificate — Mary Ann Sharp, 30 October 1913, Plain City, Weber County, Utah, No. 390

Heyburn campaign races

In October 2015 I copied three items from the local news while following the Heyburn municipal election. Two were articles from the Times-News and one was a paid political advertisement. Six years later I photographed four pieces of campaign literature from the November 2021 Heyburn mayoral election. All seven documents have sat in folders. I am publishing them now because the people in them should be remembered and the documents together tell a story of a small city working through hard years.


The 2015 Election

Times-News article, Heyburn Council Spats Over Consultant Pay, October 2015
Article — “Heyburn Council Spats Over Consultant Pay”
Campaign flyer, Attention Heyburn Voters, October 2015
Campaign flyer — “Attention Heyburn Voters”
Times-News article, Candidates Spar over Past in Heyburn Forum, October 2015
Article — “Candidates Spar over Past in Heyburn Forum”

The first article, by Eric Quitugua of the Times-News, concerned a dispute over pay raises granted to two city consultants — Ralph Williams, who advised on electrical matters, and Paul Aston, who handled building site consultation, agendas, legal notices, and fact-finding for planning and zoning meetings. Aston had worked with the city since the late 1980s and asked Mayor George Anderson for a raise. The council approved the raises 2-1. Councilwoman Cleo Gallegos, who was running for mayor against businessman Mark Rosa, voted against and questioned why she had not been consulted. Anderson said at the board meeting he had no answer for her. The article cited Heyburn City Code § 1-12-1, which provides that while the mayor has power to hire or discharge employees, the mayor is “without the authority to enter into any employment contract with any employees of the city without the express prior consent of the council, obtained by resolution of the council.” When a reporter asked City Attorney Steven Tuft about the matter, Tuft refused to discuss it and hung up the phone.

The campaign flyer, paid for by Lyle Santos, urged support for Rosa for mayor, Anderson for city council, and Rocky Baker for city council. It listed credentials and accomplishments for each, and charged that Gallegos and former councilwoman Joanne Justesen had voted in December 2012 for a waste contract 22% above the lowest bid, costing the city $48,000 plus $13,000 in attorney fees from the resulting lawsuit, and that Gallegos had voted to shift police dispatching from Cassia County to Minidoka County at an added cost of $7,954 per year since 2009.

The second article, also by Quitugua, covered a candidates forum hosted by the Times-News on 23 October 2015. All five candidates attended: Gallegos and Rosa for mayor, and Justesen, Baker, and Anderson for two council seats. The garbage contract was the dominant source of friction. Gallegos said she had voted for the higher bid because of an issue she could not discuss. Rosa countered that the vote had cost the city $48,000 more than necessary plus litigation costs. Anderson said he had tried to instruct the council not to fix something that wasn’t broken, but the members had not listened. Justesen said the lowest bidder had been in litigation over its ownership and she had concluded the other company was the better choice; she said she discussed it with Baker, who at the forum denied the conversation had taken place.

On the substantive questions the candidates found more common ground. Gallegos emphasized water rights and underground electric lines. Rosa spoke of fiscal responsibility and running the city like a business. Baker highlighted lift stations and sewer infrastructure costs and cautioned against the city getting ahead of itself. Anderson pointed to the 21st Street water project. Justesen raised the theme of growth, noting the city had “beautiful business parks but no businesses” and was “missing a factor.”

Transparency was the other main theme. Justesen said council minutes were too vague. Baker suggested projecting meeting paperwork on a screen for the public. Rosa agreed the minutes needed clarity. Gallegos said the city needed more public discussion of its decisions. Anderson said executive sessions were “highly sensitive” and suggested transparency would be helped if regular meetings drew crowds as large as the forum had.


Background on the Garbage Contract

The garbage contract dispute that dominated the 2015 forum had a longer history worth understanding.

In December 2012 the Heyburn City Council voted to award the city’s garbage service contract to PSI Environmental Systems at $5.65 per residential customer per month — 21 percent above the lowest bid of $4.46 submitted by Western Waste Services. Total Waste Management had also bid lower, at $4.50. The council additionally designated PSI as the city’s sole commercial garbage contractor, requiring businesses using other providers to switch. Rocky Baker was the sole dissenting vote on both motions. He called it “the worst business decision made by Heyburn in the more than 10 years he’s served on the City Council” and objected to forcing businesses away from their current providers. “We didn’t have a system that was broke,” he said.

The contract’s path to approval was itself contentious. The council heard public opposition at its regular meeting on 28 March and declined to vote. The following day it convened an emergency meeting — invoking an Idaho Open Meeting Law exemption allowing cities facing immediate financial loss to meet without the usual 24-hour posted notice — and approved the contract. Gallegos and Justesen voted yes. Baker voted no. City Attorney Tuft defended the emergency meeting: “They would have had a loss if they didn’t have a garbage contract in place today. I think it’s legitimate, personally.”

Lyle Santos, co-owner of Total Waste Management, was not informed the council would vote until about an hour before the meeting and was not allowed to address the council. He faced a 20 percent loss of his Heyburn commercial accounts and said he would have to lay off a Heyburn employee. Total Waste Management subsequently sued the city. In response, the council voted to terminate the PSI contract. The $48,000 figure cited in the 2015 campaign flyer and at the candidates forum reflected the cost difference between PSI’s contract and the lowest bid over the contract period, plus the $13,000 in attorney fees from the resulting lawsuit.

Lyle Santos was the same man who paid for the October 2015 campaign flyer attacking Gallegos and Justesen over that vote. Every figure on the flyer was accurate. The context it did not supply was that Santos had a direct financial interest in the outcome of the election. Baker, the sole vote against the contract in December 2012, appeared on that same flyer as a candidate to be supported.


Background on Heyburn and Mini-Cassia

Heyburn sits in Minidoka County on the north bank of the Snake River, across from Burley in Cassia County. The two counties together are known as Mini-Cassia, and their relationship has always been complicated — by sports rivalries, by water and land disputes, by the question of who gets to control shared resources. The J.R. Simplot Company’s departure from Heyburn is still discussed. Simplot had operated a potato-processing plant in Heyburn; after a years-long legal battle over electrical rates, the company closed the plant and gave the property to the city of Burley, which developed it into what became the Burley-Heyburn Industrial Park. “Simplot’s gift to Burley was a hard slap,” Gallegos told the Associated Press in 2018. Meanwhile, when Burley sought a site for a new airport, Heyburn annexed 320 acres into its impact zone to keep Burley from acquiring the land. Each county had its grievances and its retaliations, and they accumulated over generations.

George Anderson had been Heyburn’s mayor for twelve years by the time of the 2015 election. Cleo Gallegos had been on the city council since around 2000. Dick Galbraith had served on the Minidoka County Planning and Zoning board for nineteen years, including as its chairman, before joining the city council, where he had served for several years. Rocky Baker had served on the Heyburn Fire Department for twenty years, fourteen as assistant chief, before becoming a fire commissioner and then council president. These were not newcomers. They were people who had watched Heyburn’s struggles with infrastructure, growth, and its larger neighbor across the river for a long time.

The wastewater system was a live problem throughout this period. Heyburn’s treatment plant dated from the 1960s and had been upgraded in 1991 and 2008. The city’s collection system comprised 25 miles of pipe and 18 lift stations. By the mid-2010s the plant was falling out of EPA compliance and facing fines that threatened to bankrupt the city. Baker’s comment at the forum about lift stations and sewer lines being “a huge cost to the city” was not abstract campaign language.


What Happened: 2015–2021

Cleo Gallegos won the November 2015 mayoral election. George Anderson’s bid for a council seat was unsuccessful. Rocky Baker won a council seat.

On 6 December 2016, thirteen months after the forum, Clarence Lanier “Rocky” Baker died from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. He was 62. He had been born on 27 October 1954 — the candidates forum the day after his sixty-first birthday. He had married Georgia Schneider on 8 March 1975 at the Emerson Ward Building west of Paul, built a house in Heyburn in 1976, and never left. He had started at Ore-Ida in 1971 and worked his way up to maintenance supervisor at what became McCain Foods. His family wrote that he collected heart-shaped rocks to give to the people he loved. He was buried at the Riverside Cemetery in Heyburn. His funeral was held at the Burley United Methodist Church.

Meanwhile Gallegos was working on the wastewater problem. Through a judicial confirmation process — used because the scope of work required it — the city bonded for $12.4 million and arranged a financing package that brought the taxpayer burden down to $5.5 million through grants from the Army Corps of Engineers, USDA, and a Community Development Block Grant, saving Heyburn taxpayers $3.1 million against the total $9.6 million project cost. A $5.7 million construction contract was signed in November 2019. “I am excited for Heyburn to be moving in the right direction,” Gallegos said. “And I have nothing but pride in the direction it is going.”

In 2017, Dick Galbraith defended his council seat in one of the more unusual elections in Heyburn’s history. His race ended in a 112-112 tie. A coin toss was held per state guidelines; Galbraith called heads, and the coin fell tails. He contested the result and requested a recount. During the recount, officials discovered one ballot marked too lightly to be read by the machine, and Galbraith won 113-112. The story was picked up by CNN. “I was on City Council for 16 years and mayor for two, and I’ve never seen it,” Gallegos told CNN. “Every vote counts, especially in your small city elections.”

In November 2019 Mark Rosa defeated Gallegos for mayor and took office in January 2020. His administration was immediately contentious. At his first council meeting — a session lasting nearly three hours — Rosa requested the council restore his executive authority over city personnel, which Gallegos had delegated to the city administrator. The council tabled the request. Councilman Galbraith observed that the administrator was “here with boots on the ground, day in and day out all day long.” Councilwoman Rose Schmitt told Rosa: “I don’t know why you want all the power.” The question of mayoral authority over city employees — the same structural question at the heart of the 2015 consultant pay dispute — had not gone away.

In August 2020 a recall petition bearing more than the required 230 signatures was filed against Rosa. The petition charged that he had created a bullying culture at city offices and a hostile work environment for city employees, council members, and the city attorney; that he had refused to listen to citizens; that he had overstepped his financial authority by seeking to add funds to the budget to cover personal attorney fees to sue the city; and that he had tried to impede the city’s sewer projects. Rosa refused to resign. “I absolutely will not resign,” he told the Times-News. “All of these allegations are simply not true.”

On 3 November 2020 Heyburn voters recalled Mark Rosa by a vote of 748 to 440 — 62.96 percent in favor of recall. Rosa had won the office the prior year with 199 votes. “It’s too bad for Heyburn,” he said on election night. “But it is what it is. I feel like I never had a chance to do anything for Heyburn.”

One week later the City Council unanimously appointed Dick Galbraith as mayor and unanimously elected Joanne Justesen as council president. Galbraith said he hoped for “some healing in the city of Heyburn” and accepted the appointment as part of the responsibility he had taken on when he ran for his council seat.


The 2021 Election

Mark Rosa campaign flyer, front, November 2021
Rosa campaign flyer, front — November 2021
Mark Rosa campaign flyer, back, November 2021
Rosa campaign flyer, back — November 2021
Dick Galbraith campaign flyer, front, November 2021
Galbraith campaign flyer, front — November 2021
Dick Galbraith campaign flyer, back, November 2021
Galbraith campaign flyer, back — November 2021

Mark Rosa ran again in November 2021, as he had promised on the night of his recall. His campaign flyer attacked Galbraith and the council directly. It charged that “Dick broke his oath of office when he voted to transfer the Mayoral authority to the un-elected city administrator, as did Rose, Chad and Joann while he was on city council.” It called the judicial confirmation bond process a betrayal of the voters: “They basically told the judge, the people in Heyburn were too stupid to make the best decision by not allowing us to vote. They had to spend 5.5 Million, BUT they asked the judge to spend $12.4 Million!” It called the wastewater treatment plant location a “bad idea” and warned: “Mark doesn’t want HEYBURN to be BURLEY’S TOILET!” The flyer was paid for by the Committee to Elect Mark Rosa, Deb Hopkins, Treasurer.

Dick Galbraith’s campaign flyer offered a quieter contrast. It noted his nineteen years on the Minidoka County Planning and Zoning board, seven years on the city council, and his appointment as mayor after Rosa’s recall. It credited his tenure with establishing “proper procedures and processes to avoid any abuses by current or future elected officials and employees” and noted his work on the wastewater bond refinancing, which “saved residents almost $1 million.” His stated vision: “to provide responsible leadership for the citizens of Heyburn. I want to see Heyburn grow, but not at the expense of its citizens.” His closing line: “Working as a team is best for our city.”

Dick Galbraith won the November 2021 election. Cleo Gallegos also won a seat, returning to the mayor’s office. Mark Rosa did not prevail.


After 2021

George Anderson, who had served as Heyburn’s mayor for twelve years and whose name appeared on the 2015 opposition flyer, died on 20 September 2024 at the age of 87. He had been born in Burley on 21 June 1937. A neighbor remembered him as “a good friend, neighbor, and a great mayor.” His funeral was held at the Paul Stake Center.


These documents are offered as a record of two moments in the life of a small Idaho city — the people who served it, the questions they argued about, and what became of them afterward.

Rocky Baker collected heart-shaped rocks. George Anderson served his city for twelve years. The sewer plant got built. The city went on.


Sources: Times-News (Twin Falls), Eric Quitugua reporting, October 2015; Times-News, staff reporting, 2012–2013; paid political advertisement, Lyle Santos, October 2015; KMVT, Amy Reid reporting, December 2016 (link); Baker family obituary, December 2016; Times-News, Laurie Welch reporting, 2018–2020; Associated Press, Laurie Welch reporting, April 2018; CNN, Ryan Struyk reporting, December 2017 (link); campaign materials, Committee to Elect Mark Rosa and Dick Galbraith for Mayor, November 2021; Echovita, George A. Anderson obituary, 2024 (link).

Sharp – Cartwright Wedding

Mary Ann (Bailey) and William Sharp — son of Thomas Sharp and Elizabeth Cartwright

George and Ann (Matthews) Cartwright of Misson, Nottinghamshire, and Thomas and Anne (Stennett) Sharp of Misson, Nottinghamshire, announce the marriage of their daughter Elizabeth Cartwright to Thomas Sharp on 29 December 1823 at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Misson. The witnesses were Sarah Hunt and John Parkin.

The Cartwrights and the Sharps were both Misson families. The Cartwrights had been there for generations, Elizabeth’s grandfather John Cartwright (1730–1814) and grandmother Mary Amcoats (1742–1790) had married in Misson in 1761. Her father George Cartwright was baptized there on 3 February 1774. Her mother Ann Matthews was christened 14 September 1783 in Everton, Nottinghamshire, a village approximately eight miles southeast of Misson. Ann was the daughter of Edmund Matthews of Everton and his wife Hannah Broads, a widow who had previously been married to William Wilson of Everton. Edmund and Hannah had married in Everton on 21 May 1782. George Cartwright was nine years older than Ann Matthews. Their marriage banns were published on 23 January 1803 and they married on 1 February 1803, Elizabeth was born and baptized ten months later, on 20 December 1803. Ann Matthews Cartwright does not appear in subsequent census or other records. Her death date and burial place remain unknown.

The ties between the Sharp and Cartwright families ran deep in Misson. On the same day Thomas married Elizabeth, his brother William Sharp married Mary Cartwright, Elizabeth’s first cousin. A week earlier, on 22 December 1823, their brother John Sharp had married Ann Rather. Three Sharp brothers married in the same month of December 1823, two of them to first cousins from the same Cartwright family, all in the village of Misson.

Edmund Matthews’s will, made 27 November 1810 and proved 25 February 1820, names “Ann the wife of George Cartwright of Misson” as one of his two daughters and heirs. The estate included two tenements and dwellinghouses at Everton and a close called the Clay Field Close of approximately three acres. The will also left twenty pounds and a chest of drawers to Mary Brougham, Hannah’s daughter from her first marriage to William Wilson and Ann Matthews’s half-sister, just two years her senior. Mary Wilson had been a witness at Ann’s marriage to George Cartwright on 1 February 1803, and had married John Brougham in the years between that wedding and the writing of Edmund’s will in 1810. Under the will, Hannah received the life interest in the property. Only after Hannah’s death in September 1835 would Ann and her sister Elizabeth Matthews inherit their shares. Elizabeth Matthews had married William Brown in 1814. When William Brown died in 1846, Elizabeth returned to Everton, and her children maintained connections between Misson and Everton across the following generations. Annie Thompson records that George Beighton, whom Ann married in June 1823, gambled away her money at the Doncaster races. The timing is suggestive: Ann’s inheritance from the Matthews Everton estate would have arrived in 1835, twelve years after the Beighton marriage. If Beighton dissipated that inheritance at Doncaster, Elizabeth Cartwright Sharp, then 31 years old, would have witnessed it directly. The will is the source of the “wealth and refinement” tradition in Annie Thompson’s account, the Matthews family owned real property in Everton, modest but substantial for a labouring community.

Will of Edmund Matthews of Everton, Nottinghamshire, made 27 November 1810, proved 25 February 1820. Names “Ann the wife of George Cartwright of Misson” as heir.

The Sharps had traveled a longer road to Misson. Thomas Sharp’s father, Thomas Sharp Sr., was born on 18 September 1768 in Armthorpe, Yorkshire, a village three miles east of Doncaster. Thomas Sr was the son of John Edward Sharp (1730–1806) and Frances Fretwell (1733–1809). He married Anne Stennett on 3 November 1788 at Ewerby, Lincolnshire, approximately thirty-five miles southeast of Armthorpe. Anne had been born there on 30 July 1769, the daughter of John Barber Stennett and Lettice Housley. The family’s first children were born in Lincolnshire: Elizabeth at Ewerby on 9 July 1790, and Ann at Ewerby on 13 May 1792. The family then moved northward toward Yorkshire at some point in the 1790s, with the next confirmed records placing them in Cantley, Yorkshire by 1799.

Some researchers have linked a Thomas Sharp christened 1 November 1794 and an Elizabeth Sharp christened 5 December 1795, both in Stamford, Lincolnshire, to this family. However the connection is uncertain and unlikely. Stamford is approximately 30 miles from Ewerby and 65 miles from Cantley, a significant distance for a labouring family to travel. The Stamford Thomas was buried just seven days after his christening, on 8 November 1794, and the Stamford Elizabeth died in Stamford on 23 October 1799, age 4. Multiple Sharp families lived in Stamford at this period, making misidentification likely. Researcher Leanne Maynes, who has examined these records carefully, has noted the timeline does not fit comfortably with the family’s confirmed movements and has not incorporated these children into the family line. The records are noted here but not included in the family line pending further research.

How Thomas Sharp Sr. came to be in Ewerby, Lincolnshire, fifty-four miles from Armthorpe, is an open question. Agricultural labourers typically found work through hiring fairs held at Martinmas in local market towns, where employers hired workers for the coming season. Movement of two to three miles between hirings was typical for a day labourer. A farm servant who lived in with his employer could travel further, up to thirty miles from his home parish, but fifty-four miles was exceptional. Whether Thomas traveled by foot, by water along the River Don and Trent, or through some family or employer connection to Lincolnshire is not known. One possibility worth noting is that Elizabeth Sharp, who married William Duffin in Ewerby in June 1788, just months before Thomas married Ann Stennett there in November 1788, was also described as of that parish. Whether Elizabeth was a relative of Thomas who had preceded him to Ewerby, and whether a family connection brought Thomas there, remains an open question that further research into Lincolnshire records may eventually resolve.

The Misson parish register notes local agricultural disasters that give context to labour movement in the region. In the 1740s the cattle herds in the area suffered severely from the cattle distemper, a murrain that ravaged England between 1745 and 1757 and killed at least half a million cattle nationally. Parliament passed multiple acts attempting to contain the outbreak, and preachers of the period described it as a national judgment. Repeated outbreaks followed in later decades, and in 1866 a cattle plague destroyed over 200 head of cattle in the Misson area alone. Whether this pattern of agricultural disruption influenced the Sharp family’s movement between Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, and Nottinghamshire is not documented, but the regional context is worth noting.

By approximately 1797 the family had returned northward toward Yorkshire. The Cantley parish register, held at Doncaster Archives, reference P12-1-A3, confirms Thomas Sharp Sr. and Anne in Cantley, Yorkshire by October 1799, when their daughter Mary was baptized there on 20 October 1799. Cantley lies five miles east of Doncaster, neighboring Armthorpe where Thomas Sharp Sr. had been born. George Sharp was born in Cantley on 9 May 1804 and baptized there on 22 July 1804. A Cantley christening of 5 March 1797 is almost certainly this Thomas. The family was in Cantley throughout this period, and the dates and geography align. By 1810 the family had settled in Misson, approximately ten miles south of Cantley, where Ann Sharp was baptized on 11 March 1810 and James Sharp on 7 March 1813.

Thomas Sharp Sr. died in Misson on 23 August 1847, age 78, found lying in the street by a neighbor named Elizabeth Orton. She thought he was having a fit, obtained the assistance of William Mason and John Hobson, but he died immediately. The inquest verdict was visitation of God. The inquest notice appeared in the Lincoln Rutland and Stamford Mercury on 3 September 1847.

Inquest notice for Thomas Sharpe, Lincoln Rutland and Stamford Mercury, 3 September 1847, p. 3
Death certificate for Thomas Sharp Sr., died 23 August 1847, Misson. GRO DYB565322.

His wife Anne died in Misson on 10 December 1849, age approximately 79, from a fall, and was buried three days later. Their death notices appeared in the same Lincolnshire newspaper, the family had maintained connections across sixty years and three counties.

Death certificate for Ann Sharp (née Stennett), widow of Thomas Sharp Sr., died 10 December 1849, Misson. GRO DYB565321.

Thomas Sharp’s younger brother James had died of Consumption on 5 June 1839, with Elizabeth as the informant at his death. Six months later, on 7 January 1840, Thomas and Elizabeth named their newborn son James. Whether the name was chosen in memory of the brother lost that summer is not known, but the timing is suggestive. Consumption, known colloquially as the white death, is the historical name for tuberculosis, a contagious airborne disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In 1815, one in four deaths in England was due to Consumption. In a labouring family’s small home in Misson, the disease would have moved freely through the household. Thomas Sharp, born approximately 1797, probably in Cantley, was a Labourer, as recorded on his children’s birth certificates and his own death certificate. The death certificate gives his age at death as 43 years, the burial record as 45. This two-year spread likely reflects the imprecision natural to a family where neither parent could write and where exact ages were not always known. Thomas died of the same Consumption that had killed his brother just two years before, on 13 July 1841 at Misson, just weeks after the June 1841 Census recorded him in the household. His sister Ann Thickett, wife of Thomas Thickett of Blyth, Yorkshire, four miles north of Misson, was present at his death and registered it. He was buried at Misson on 15 July 1841.

The disease continued through the family. Ann Thickett, who had been present at Thomas’s death in 1841, died of Consumption on 6 April 1846, age 36, just five years after registering her brother’s death from the same disease. George Sharp, another brother, died of Consumption on 8 August 1846, age 47, four months after Ann. Between 1839 and 1846, four of Thomas Sharp Sr. and Anne Stennett’s children died of tuberculosis. Thomas Sharp Sr. survived all four, dying in August 1847. Anne survived until December 1849. They outlived four of their children to the same disease.

Death certificate for Thomas Sharp, died 13 July 1841, Misson, of Consumption. GRO DYB541596.

Annie Thompson, writing from family tradition in 1957, describes Elizabeth as having grown up “a tall young lady, reared in an atmosphere of wealth and refinement.” Her father George Cartwright was buried at Misson on 27 February 1820, age 46, when Elizabeth was sixteen years old. Three years later, on 4 June 1823, her mother Ann remarried a widower named George Beighton at the Misson parish church, by banns, witnessed by John Robinson and John Cartwright, confirmed in the Bishop’s Transcripts in the Nottinghamshire Archives. Six months after her mother’s remarriage, Elizabeth married Thomas Sharp.

Elizabeth could not write. On both her daughter Ann’s birth certificate in 1838 and her son James’s birth certificate in 1840, she signed with an X mark.

Thomas and Elizabeth had eight children, all baptized in the Misson parish church and recorded in the Bishop’s Transcripts at the Nottinghamshire Archives. The dates below give the christening date from the Bishop’s Transcripts, the birth dates held in family tradition are noted separately where they differ, representing the difference between the event remembered by the family and the event recorded by the church.

George Sharp, christened 11 November 1824, died 15 November 1824, four days old.

Mary Sharp, baptized 27 November 1825, died in infancy and was buried approximately two days after her christening, as noted in the Misson Parish Register.

William Sharp, christened 7 January 1827, family tradition gives his birth as 10 December 1826. He would go on to help found Plain City, Utah. See Sharp-Bailey Wedding and the William Sharp Personal History.

George Sharp, baptized 13 May 1829, died 23 December 1833, age four years and seven months, buried at Misson. The Misson Parish Register notes his cause of death as burns. Burns were tragically common among small children in this period, when open hearths were the only source of heat and cooking in labouring family homes. Whether his clothing caught fire near an open flame or the death resulted from a structure fire is not known, and no newspaper account of the event has been located.

Isabella Sharp, christened 15 January 1832, family tradition gives her birth as 22 December 1831. She would emigrate with William to Utah and settle in Mill Creek, Salt Lake County. See Sons of Joseph and Isabella Carlisle.

Elizabeth Sharp, baptized 11 June 1834, she remained in St. Louis and married John Quayle. See John and Elizabeth Quayle.

Ann Sharp, born 8 July 1838, baptized 29 July 1838, died 2 September 1838, eight weeks old, of convulsions. Convulsions in infants of this period were typically caused by uncontrolled fever from bacterial or viral infections, untreatable before the development of antibiotics and fever-reducing medications. Elizabeth registered her birth with an X mark on 10 July 1838. A neighbor, Mary Laister, registered her death, Elizabeth was not the informant.

Birth certificate for Ann Sharpe, born 8 July 1838, Misson. Elizabeth signed with her X mark.
Death record for Ann Sharpe, died 2 September 1838, Misson, age 8 weeks, of Convulsions.

James Sharp, born 7 January 1840, confirmed by GRO birth certificate (BXCC548222), with Elizabeth signing as informant with her X mark on 22 January 1840. See James Sharp.

Birth certificate for James Sharp, born 7 January 1840, Misson. GRO BXCC548222. Elizabeth signed with her X mark.

By the time Thomas died in July 1841, the family had buried four children. George at four days, Mary in infancy, the second George at four and a half years, and Ann at eight weeks. The 1841 Census, taken just weeks before Thomas’s death, records the household: Thomas (40), Elizabeth (37), William (14), Isabella (9), Elizabeth (5), and James (1). Thomas Sharp Sr. was living just a few households away in the same village.

Milo Riley Sharp, grandson of Thomas Sharp and Elizabeth Cartwright

Conversion and Emigration

William Sharp was the first family member baptized into the LDS Church, or formally The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, on 20 June 1848. His mother Elizabeth followed on 11 August 1849, and Isabella on 16 September 1849. The Misson History Hub records that “In 1848 LDS Missionaries visited the village and several conversions apparently took place” and notes that the converted “travelled to the USA, crossed the continent and made new lives and families there.” Among the elders who lodged at Elizabeth’s home was Elder George Emery.

Elizabeth decided to emigrate with her family to Utah. Annie Thompson records the family’s resistance: “her folks tried hard to discourage her from taking the hazardous trip; they told her if you leave for the West, ‘A red Indian will eat ye.’” The ticket cost twenty-five pounds sterling. On 2 October 1850 Elizabeth (age 45), William (age 24), Isabella (age 19), Elizabeth (age 26), and James (age 10) sailed from Liverpool on the ship James Pennell, under the direction of Church leader Christopher Layton. There were 254 Latter-day Saint emigrants on board, the Fiftieth Company.

The voyage nearly ended in disaster. As the James Pennell approached the mouth of the Mississippi River, a terrible storm drove the ship back into the Gulf of Mexico, breaking the main and mizzen masts and washing part of the rigging overboard. The crippled vessel drifted for several days with provisions nearly exhausted before a pilot boat found it and guided it to the river mouth on 20 November. The Millennial Star reported simply that the James Pennell “had lost her main and mizen masts, which is all the information given of her.” The ship arrived in New Orleans on 22 November 1850, towed alongside the Joseph Badger, which had sailed from Liverpool two weeks after the Pennell. The full dramatic account is preserved in the William Sharp Personal History. The voyage is documented at Saints by Sea (BYU), where the Sharp family passengers are listed.

From New Orleans the family traveled by river to St. Louis, Missouri. Shortly after arriving, Elizabeth fell ill. She died on 17 February 1851 in St. Louis, never reaching Utah. She was 47 years old. Her burial place in St. Louis has not been located. Annie Thompson gives her death as “probably late in the year 1850.” The 17 February 1851 date comes from other sources and is consistent with a November 1850 arrival and a short illness through that winter. Her children were left on their own in an unfamiliar city. Elizabeth Sharp married John Quayle and remained in St. Louis. James, aged eleven, tried to arrange passage west but the company he was to travel with turned back; he stayed in St. Louis and eventually became a partner in a meat packing business. William married the widowed Mary Ann Bailey Padley in St. Louis, and in 1853 he and Isabella, now married to Joseph Carlisle, traveled west in the Moses Clawson Company, arriving in Salt Lake Valley between 15 and 20 September 1853.

Temple Work

In December 1881 Isabella Sharp Carlisle traveled from Mill Creek, Salt Lake County, to the St. George Utah Temple, at that time the only operating temple in the world, to perform proxy ordinances for her deceased daughter Elizabeth Ann Carlisle. While there, between 20 and 23 December 1881, ordinances were completed for her father Thomas Sharp and her paternal grandfather Thomas Sharp Sr., and the sealings of both men to their wives. Ordinances were also completed for her maternal grandmother Ann Matthews Cartwright, baptism, confirmation, and sealing to George Cartwright, with the St. George Temple record identifying Ann Matthews Cartwright by name and marriage details, confirming the family connection across three generations. Ordinances were completed for six people across four generations in four days.

Thomas Sharp’s sealing to Elizabeth Cartwright was completed 30 April 1920.

Of the children of Thomas Sharp Sr. and Anne Stennett who survived to adulthood, John Sharp died on 29 July 1866 in Misson of Bronchitis and Emphysema, the last of the siblings to remain in the village. William Sharp died on 27 October 1867 in Canada, having emigrated there with his family around the same time Elizabeth Cartwright Sharp, Thomas Jr.’s widow, left England for America in 1850. The emigrations of brother and sister in law, in the same decade, from the same small village, to different continents, closes the Misson chapter of the Sharp family story.

Sources

Primary documents: Thomas Sharp death certificate (GRO DYB541596, 13 July 1841); Thomas Sharp burial, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives (15 July 1841); Elizabeth Cartwright baptism, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives, FHL film #503793 (20 December 1803); Thomas Sharp and Elizabeth Cartwright marriage, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives, page 14 (29 December 1823); Ann Sharp birth certificate (GRO, 8 July 1838); Ann Sharp death record (GRO, 2 September 1838); James Sharp birth certificate (GRO BXCC548222, 7 January 1840); 1841 Census of England and Wales, Misson, household 1612123; children’s christenings confirmed in Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives, pages 34 (George 1824), 37 (Mary 1825), 42 (William 1827), 50 (second George 1829), 60 (Isabella 1832), 69 (Elizabeth 1834); second George Sharp burial, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives, page 32 (23 December 1833); Thomas Sharp Sr. christening, Bishop’s Transcripts, Borthwick Institute for Archives (18 September 1768, Armthorpe); Thomas Sharp Sr. death certificate (GRO DYB565322, 23 August 1847); Ann Sharp Sr. death certificate (GRO DYB565321, 10 December 1849); George Cartwright baptism and burial, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives; Ann Matthews christening, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives (14 September 1783); Will of Edmund Matthews of Everton, proved 25 February 1820; Death Duty Register IR27/174, The National Archives; Ann Matthews and George Cartwright marriage, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives (1 February 1803); Ann Matthews and George Beighton marriage, Bishop’s Transcripts, Nottinghamshire Archives, page 13 (4 June 1823); Thomas Sharp Sr. christening (Armthorpe) and Thomas Sharp Sr. and Anne Stennett marriage (Ewerby, Lincolnshire), Lincolnshire Parish Registers; James Sharp (brother) death record, Misson Parish Register (5 June 1839); Mary Sharp burial, Misson Parish Register (approximately 29 November 1825); George Sharp (1829) cause of death, Misson Parish Register (burns, 23 December 1833); Ann Thickett death record, Misson area (6 April 1846); George Sharp death record (8 August 1846); John Sharp death record, Misson (29 July 1866).

Secondary sources: Annie Thompson, Life History of Elizabeth Cartwright Sharp, 27 August 1957; William Sharp Personal History; Kent Nielsen (1931–2020), a great grandson of Joseph and Isabella Sharp Carlisle and thus of Thomas Sharp and Elizabeth Cartwright, contributed extensive primary source research to the FamilySearch Collaborate record for this family between 2011 and 2014. His careful documentation of the Cantley, Yorkshire connection, the GRO certificates, and the census evidence forms the foundation of the genealogical record presented here. FamilySearch Collaborate notes on Thomas Sharp (KWJ5-679) and Thomas Sharp Sr. (KP7V-4HL), 2011–2014; Leanne Maynes, a great great granddaughter of Joseph and Isabella Sharp Carlisle and thus of Thomas Sharp and Elizabeth Cartwright, whose ongoing research into the Sharp and related families has contributed additional primary source analysis, including the Misson Parish Register details on infant burials and causes of death, the identification of the Stamford records as a likely misattribution, and the TB deaths among Thomas Sharp Sr.’s children in the 1840s; Saints by Sea, BYU, James Pennell voyage 2 October–23 November 1850; Misson History Hub, Written History.

For more on the Sharp family and Plain City’s founding generation, see:

Sharp-Bailey Wedding — William Sharp and Mary Ann Bailey
Sons of Joseph and Isabella Carlisle — Isabella Sharp and Joseph Carlisle
John and Elizabeth Quayle — Elizabeth Sharp and John Quayle
James Sharp — James Sharp in St. Louis
Early Settlers in Lehi, Utah, before Plain City, Utah — William Sharp (no. 68) on the Lehi consecration list
History of Plain City — the community William Sharp helped found
Sharp Family History Outreach — broader Sharp family connections

William Fredrick Andra Autobiography

Andra Boys: William, Donald, Larry, Bill, Golden, Dale, Ross
Andra Boys: William, Donald, Larry, Bill, Golden, Dale, Ross

A copy of this autobiography of my Great Grandfather was given to me years ago.  I wanted to make it more widely available.  I will insert clarification or other information in brackets []. I have attached the handwritten copy so you can see his handwriting.

The Life Story of William Fredrick Andra Sr
I was born on February 11, 1898 in Meissen, Saxony, Germany to Wilhimina [Wilhelmina Christiana Knauke] and Theodor F. [Fredrick] Andra.  My father died when I was about four years old [23 November 1902].

I was baptized in the Elbe River in [16] April 1909; came to the United States in the following month of May.  I left at the age of eleven, one year ahead of the rest of the family.

The following year they were ready to come to the U.S. on the same boat but were, for some reason, delayed a month.  The boat that they had intended on traveling on sank in the mid ocean.  “The Lord moves in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform!”

Upon arriving here, I went to Fairview, Utah to work out my board and room from John R. Anderson, who was a former missionary in Germany.

After being in Fairview one year, I went back to Salt Lake to meet the rest of the family when they arrived.

We had quit a struggle at first, but we made out when the rest had learned the language.

I used to deliver papers, work at the slaughter house to obtain different kinds of meats to help support the family, and did all other types of odd jobs.

At the age of fourteen, my Mother took me to Preston, Idaho to the home of a former missionary [George Wanner] that helped convert my mother in Germany.

I thinned, hoed and topped beets; worked in the potatoes; and did many other things around the farm.  There were about 24 head of cows to be milked.  For my work, I got $18.00 a month.  The next summer I got $25.00 and then $30.00 per month.

In the winter I went back to Salt Lake City because there wasn’t any work left on the farm.

I worked in the Apex Mine in Bingham at the same time that Jack Dempsey was a diamond drill sharpener.

The next winter I worked in the coal mine at Wattis in Carbon County during the flu epidemic in 1918.  My future father-in-law [George Wanner] took the flu and was in the hospital in Salt Lake City.  Shortly after his boy, Golden, also caught the flu and died.  I took the body home to Whitney, Idaho on the train.

I did the chores for the family because they all had the flu.  After working for George Wanner, 7 year on and off, I married at the age of 22 to his daughter, Mary Louise Wanner, in the Salt Lake Temple on March 10, 1920.

At a time when things were tough, I worked on the farm for James R. Bodily and in the winter I did janitor work at the Whitney School and meeting house for $30.00 a month.  Then our son, William Junior was born.  During this time I helped build the sugar factory in Whitney.

In 1922 we moved to Salt Lake City and I worked for the Royal Bakery for one year, then we moved back to Preston and went into the café business with my brother, Walter.  We stayed in the café business until the end of 1925, then we bought the Wanner farm in Preston during the depression times.

I used to dig basements, haul gravel and sand, haul sugar beets from the beet piles to the sugar factory for $4.00 a ton.  It was hard making this $1000.00 principle and $500.00 interest but with the Lord’s help and a good wife and children, we paid for the farm.  In 1937 we bought 9 more acres on the east side of our farm, making 44 acres.

In 1937, I was made a High Priest.  I have been a ward teacher for 36 years, ward teaching supervisor for 7 years, and a group leader for the High Priests Quorum for 12 years.

I am, at present, a director of the Mink Creek-Riverdale Canal Company.

Our main crops on this farm have been sugar beets and potatoes.  We have raised peas and corn for many years.

Our present family consists of 12 children, 8 boys and 4 girls (of which 2 of the boys have passed on).

In 1947, I had a back fusion operation.  It was very successful.

Seven of our children are married from which we have received 28 grand children and 2 great grand children.  One of our boys is in the Western States Mission now.  We have had 2 on missions previously.

I would like to pass this biography on to my son.

Prepared and arranged November 28, 1961
by William F. Andra, Sr. (Age 63)
— AUTOBIOGRAPHY —

Continued details: See life story of Mary Louise Wanner Andra

The principle factors that determined the success of William F. Andra and his wife, Mary Louise Wanner Andra, were ambition and religion.  Always fight for the good!

Title 9: SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

9-1: GENERAL SUBDIVISION PROVISIONS:

9-1-1: TITLE:

These regulations shall be known and cited as the CITY OF MINIDOKA SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-1-2: AUTHORITY:

These regulations are adopted pursuant to title 50, chapter 13 and title 67, chapter 65 of the Idaho Code. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-1-3: PURPOSE:

The purposes of these regulations are to promote the public health, safety, general welfare, and to provide for:

A. The harmonious development of the city;

B. The coordination of streets, alleys and easements in new subdivisions with existing and future development and improvements;

C. Adequate park and open spaces for travel, light, fresh air and recreation;

D. Adequate transportation, water, sanitary drainage, irrigation and other public services and facilities;

E. Economical development and extension of public facilities and services to meet the demands of growth;

F. An orderly and efficient procedure for submission and disposal of requests for approval of subdivision plats;

G. The delegation of authority for administration of these regulations. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-1-4: JURISDICTION:

These regulations shall apply to the subdivision and development of all land within the incorporated territory of the city, including the property within the area of impact of the city under section 50-1306, Idaho Code as defined by previous ordinance, including the property within one mile of the corporate limits of such city under the provisions of section 50-1306, Idaho Code. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-1-5: INTERPRETATION:

All subdivisions as herein defined shall be submitted for approval of the council and shall comply with the provisions of these regulations. These regulations shall supplement all other regulations, and where at variance with other laws, regulations, ordinances, or resolutions, the more restrictive requirements shall apply. This title shall not apply to any subdivision created and recorded prior to the effective date hereof, except for the further dividing of lots; nor is it intended by this title to repeal, abrogate, annul or in any way impair or interfere with existing provisions of other laws, ordinances, or regulations, or with private restrictions placed upon property by deed, covenant or other private agreements, or with restrictive covenants running with the land to which the city is a party. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-1-6: ADMINISTRATION:

The city council shall administer this title, consistent with title 8, chapter 12 of this code, and shall receive and act upon all subdivision applications. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-1-7: COMBINING OF PERMITS:

The council is hereby required to combine all permits which may be required in this title and previously or subsequently adopted city ordinances which are relative to land development into one permit application procedure. In conjunction with a combined permit, the council shall coordinate methods of approval with the respective departments for the purpose of reducing errors and unnecessary delay in processing applications. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-1-8: SEVERABILITY:

Where any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section, or other part of these regulations is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall affect only that part so held invalid. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-2: SUBDIVISION DEFINITIONS:

9-2-1: INTERPRETATION OF TERMS OR WORDS:

For the purposes of these regulations, certain terms or words used herein shall be interpreted as follows:

A. The present tense includes the past or future tense, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular;

B. The word “shall” is mandatory; “may” is permissive; the word “should” is preferred; and

C. The masculine shall include the feminine.

9-2-2: MEANINGS OF TERMS OR WORDS:

BLOCK: A group of lots, tracts, or parcels within well defined boundaries, usually streets.

BUILDING: A structure designed or used as the living quarters for one or more families, or the structure designed or used for occupancy by people for commercial or industrial uses.

BUILDING SETBACK LINE: An imaginary line established by subdivision regulations and zoning provisions requiring all buildings to be set back a certain distance from lot lines and street rights of way.

BUILDING SITE: An area proposed or provided and improved by grading, filling, excavation or other means for erecting pads for buildings.

CEMETERY: A lot that has been planned for the selling of sites for the burial of animal or human remains.

COUNCIL: The mayor and city council as appointed by the council to administer this title, having jurisdiction over the parcel of land under consideration.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A plan, comprehensive plan, or comprehensive development plan adopted by the local authority and showing the general location and extent of present and proposed development, including, but not limited to, housing, industrial and commercial uses, streets, parks, schools and other community facilities.

CONDOMINIUM: An estate consisting of: a) an undivided interest in common in real property, in an interest or interests in real property, or in any combination thereof, together with b) a separate interest in real property, in an interest or interests in real property, or in combination thereof.

COUNCIL: The city council of the municipal governing body.

COUNTY RECORDER: The office of the county recorder.

COVENANT: A written promise or pledge.

CULVERT: A drain that channels water under a bridge, street, road or driveway.

DEDICATION: The setting apart of land or interests in land for use by the public. Land becomes dedicated when accepted by the city as a public dedication, either by ordinance, resolution, or entry in the official minutes, or by the recording of a plat showing such dedication.

DEVELOPER: Authorized agent(s) of a subdivider or the subdivider himself.

DWELLING UNIT: Any building or other structure, proposed or built for occupancy by people.

DWELLING UNIT (PREFAB): A building or other structure, proposed or built for occupancy by people that is designed for initial transportation on streets and highways which arrives at a site where it is installed on a permanent foundation.

EASEMENT: A grant by a property owner to specific persons or to the public to use land for specific purposes.

ENGINEER: Any person who is licensed in the state to practice professional engineering.

GOVERNING BODY: The mayor and city council of the city of Minidoka, Idaho.

HIGHWAY: A street designated as a highway by an appropriate state or federal agency.

IMPROVEMENT: Any alteration to the land or other physical constructions associated with subdivision and building site developments.

LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT: A subdivision the size of which consists of thirty (30) or more lots or dwelling units.

LOT: A parcel, plot, tract, or other land area of suitable size as required in these regulations and existing zoning ordinances; and created by subdivision for sale, transfer, or lease.

LOT AREA: The area of any lot shall be determined exclusive of street, highway, alley, road, or other rights of way.

LOT TYPES: As used in these regulations, lot types are as follows: Corner Lot: A lot located at the intersection of two (2) or more streets; or, a lot bounded on at least two (2) sides by the same street. Interior Lot: A lot other than a corner lot, with frontage on only one street. Reversed Lot: A lot with frontage on a side street or other right of way other than an interior or corner lot. Through Lot: A lot with frontage on more than one street, not a corner lot. Also known as a double frontage lot. Through lots are prohibited under these regulations unless such a lot meets the criteria of a “backup lot” in subsection 9-4-10F of this title.

MOBILE HOME: A single-family dwelling designated for transportation after fabrication on streets and highways on its own wheels or on a flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete and ready for occupancy, except for minor incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations, connections to utilities, and the like. A prefab dwelling unit or travel trailer is not to be considered as a mobile home. A travel trailer is one that can legally be towed by passenger car.

MOBILE HOME PARK: A park designed and intended for purposes of rental spaces where residence is in mobile homes exclusively.

MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION: A subdivision designed and intended for residential use where residence is in mobile homes exclusively.

MONUMENT: Any permanent marker either of concrete, galvanized iron pipe, or iron or steel rods, used to permanently establish any tract, parcel, lot or street lines, as specified in section 50-1303, Idaho Code.

OPEN SPACE: An area open to the sky for outdoor recreation activity. Streets, buildings, or other covered structures are not included in computing these areas.

ORIGINAL PARCEL OF LAND: A lot or tract as recorded on any plat or record on file in the office of the county recorder, each one- sixteenth (1/16) of a section (40 acres) or any unplatted contiguous parcel of land held in one ownership and of record at the effective date of this title.

OWNER: The individual, firm, association, syndicate, partnership, or corporation having proprietary interest in the land to be subdivided.

PERFORMANCE BOND: An amount of money or other negotiable security paid by the subdivider or his surety to the city clerk and recorder which guarantees that the subdivider will perform all actions required by an approved plat, and provides that if the subdivider defaults and fails to comply with provisions of an approved plat, the subdivider or his surety will pay damages up to the limit of the bond, or the surety will itself complete the requirements of the approved plat. The amount of the bond shall be set by the council in its sole discretion.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A use or a combination of residential, commercial and industrial uses planned for a tract of land to be developed as a unit under single ownership or control, which is developed for the purpose of selling or renting individual lots or estates, whether fronting on private or dedicated streets, which may include two (2) or more principal buildings as governed by the zoning title. The requirements of this title may be modified by the council to achieve the best possible planned development for the specific site under consideration.

PLAT: The drawing, mapping, or planning of a subdivision, cemetery, townsite or other tract of land or a replatting of such including certifications, descriptions and approvals.

A. Preliminary Plat: The first formal presentation by maps or drawings of a proposed subdivision, as required in these regulations.

B. Final Plat: The final and formal presentation by maps or drawings of an approved subdivision development, the original and one copy of which is filed with the county clerk and recorder.

RESERVE STRIP: A strip of land between a dedicated street or partial street and adjacent property, in either case, reserved or held in public ownership for future street extension or widening.

RIGHT OF WAY: A strip of land dedicated or served for use as a public way of which normally includes sidewalks and other public utilities of service areas.

SIDEWALK: That portion of the street right of way outside the street pavement, which is improved for pedestrian use (also known as a walkway).

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: Shall be the specifications as may be specified in this title or as officially adopted by the city.

STATE: The state of Idaho.

STREET: A right of way which provides access to adjacent properties, the dedication of which has been officially accepted. The term “street” also includes the terms highway, thoroughfare, parkway, road, avenue, boulevard, lane, place, and similar terms. Some related terms and definitions are as follows: Alley: A minor street providing secondary access at the back or side of a property otherwise abutting a street. Arterial: A street designated for the purpose of carrying fast and/or heavy traffic. Collector: A street designated for the purpose of carrying traffic from minor streets to other collector streets and/or arterial streets. Commercial: A street designated for the purpose of providing traffic movement in a commercial area. Cul-De-Sac: A street connected to another street at one end only and provided with a turnaround space. Dead End: A street connecting to another street at one end only and not having provision for vehicular turnaround at its terminus. Frontage: A minor street, parallel to and adjacent to an arterial street, which has the primary purpose of providing access to abutting properties. Industrial: A street designated for the purpose of providing traffic movement in an industrial area. Loop: A minor street with both terminal points on the same street of origin. Minor: A street which has the primary purpose of providing access to abutting properties. Partial: A dedicated right of way providing only a portion of the required street width, usually along the edge of a subdivision or tract of land. Private: A street which provides vehicular and pedestrian access to one or more properties, however, not accepted for public dedication or maintenance. Side Street: A secondary street that provides access to a corner lot toward which the principal building is not oriented.

SUBDIVIDER: The individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association, syndicate, trust, or other legal entity that executes the application and initiates proceedings for the subdivision of land in accordance with the provisions of the ordinance; the subdivider need not be the owner of the property, however, he shall be an agent of the owner or have sufficient proprietary rights in the property to represent the owner.

SUBDIVISION: The division of an original lot, tract, or parcel of land into more than two (2) parts for the purpose of transfer of ownership or development; the dedication of a public street and the addition to, or creation of, a cemetery. However, this title shall not apply to any of the following:

A. An adjustment of lot lines as shown on a recordage, width, depth, or building setback lines of each building site below the minimum zoning requirements, and does not change the original number of lots in any block of the recorded plat;

B. An allocation of land in the settlement of an estate of a decedent or a court decree for the distribution of property;

C. The unwilling sale of land as a result of legal condemnation as defined and allowed in the Idaho Code;

D. Widening of existing streets to conform to the comprehensive plan;

E. The acquisition of collector and arterial street rights of way by a public agency in conformance with the comprehensive plan; and

F. The exchange of land for the purpose of straightening property boundaries which does not result in the change of the present land usage of the properties involved.

SURVEYOR: Any person who is licensed in the state as a public land surveyor to do professional surveying.

TRAVEL TRAILER PARK: Rental space for travel trailers on a limited basis.

UTILITIES: Installations for conducting water, sewage, gas, electricity, television, storm drains, and similar facilities providing service to and used by the public.

VARIANCE: A modification of the strict terms of the relevant regulations where such modification will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of the action of the applicant, a literal enforcement of the regulations would result in unnecessary and undue hardship.

VICINITY MAP: A small scale map showing the location of a tract of land in relation to a larger area. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-3: PROCEDURE FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL:

9-3-1: SUBDIVISION REQUIRED:

Any person desiring to create a “subdivision” as herein defined shall submit all necessary applications to the Clerk. No final plat shall be recorded with the County Recorder until the plat has been acted upon by the council and approved by the Council. No lots shall be sold from any plat nor building permits issued until it has been recorded with the County Recorder. Unless modified by action of the Council, the provisions of this chapter shall also apply to planned unit developments. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-3-2: PREAPPLICATION:

A. Application: To begin the preliminary plat process, the applicant shall submit a completed subdivision preapplication form as provided by the City to the Mayor’s office. The sketch plan shall include the entire development scheme of the proposed subdivision, in schematic form including the area proposed for immediate development in such a form and content as required by the council and shall include the following:

1. The general layout of streets, blocks, and lots in sketch form.

2. The existing conditions and characteristics of the land adjacent to the proposed subdivision.

3. Areas set aside for schools, parks and other public facilities.

B. Fee: None required.

C. Preapplication Approval Procedure: The applicant shall submit the preapplication and plans to the Clerk. After determining a complete application, the Building Official will schedule, within thirty (30) days, a meeting to review the application with representatives of the local fire district and any other applicable utility or agency. At the aforementioned meeting, the applicant shall present the preapplication and intent for review and comment by the Building Official and other agency representatives. The Building Official and the other agency representatives will review the preapplication to determine its compliance with this title as well as the following concerns:

1. The compliance of the proposed development with existing City, local or State policies, goals and objectives or development plans;

2. Determination of potential conflicts which may require a rezone, special development permit, or variance and whether such requirements can be combined into one permit;

3. Advise the applicant of any unique environmental or hazardous concerns that may be directly or indirectly associated with the subject property such areas that have been designated by the State as areas of critical environmental concern, unique plant or animal life, floodplain, airport flight pattern and the like; and

4. Provide the applicant with all necessary forms and checklists. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-3-3: PRELIMINARY PLAT:

A. Application: Upon completion of the preapplication procedures, the applicant may file with the Clerk a complete subdivision application with preliminary plat data as required in this title.

B. Combining Processes for Both Preliminary and Final Plats: The applicant may also request that the subdivision application be processed as both a preliminary and final plat if the following conditions are met:

1. The proposed subdivision does not exceed ten (10) lots;

2. No major work is required on existing street network;

3. No major special development considerations are involved, such as infrastructure development or the like; and

4. All required information submittals for both preliminary and final plat are complete and in an acceptable form. A request to combine both preliminary plat and final plat into one application shall be acted upon by the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee.

C. Content Of Preliminary Plat: Preliminary plat shall contain the information required under subsection D of this section. Additional maps or date deemed necessary by the Mayor’s office may also be required. The applicant shall submit to the Mayor’s office at least the following:

1. A preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision, drawn in accordance with the requirements hereinafter stated;

2. Preliminary engineered concept plans for electrical, streets, water, wastewater, sidewalks, and other required public improvements, including a master utility map; said engineered plans shall contain sufficient information and detail to enable the Building Official to make a preliminary determination as to conformance of the proposed improvements with applicable code, regulations, and standards as outlined in this title;

3. A written application requesting approval of the preliminary plat on a form prescribed by the Mayor’s office; and

4. Appropriate information that sufficiently details the proposed development within any special development area, such as hillside, planned unit development, floodplain, cemetery, mobile home, large scale development, hazards and unique areas of development.

D. Requirement Of Preliminary Plats and Plat Applications: The following shall be shown on any preliminary plat submitted or shall be submitted:

1. Name of the proposed subdivision;

2. Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the present owners of the property (with written and signed consent), the subdivider(s), the surveyor, and/or engineer;

3. Name and address of all adjoining property owners;

4. Legal description of the subdivision;

5. Statement of the intended use of the proposed subdivision, such as residential single-family; two-family and multiple housing; commercial; industrial; recreational; or agricultural and a showing of any sites proposed for parks, playgrounds, schools, churches or other public uses;

6. Map of the entire area scheduled for development if the proposed subdivision is a portion of a larger holding intended for subsequent development;

7. Vicinity map showing the relationship of the proposed plat to the surrounding area (1/4 mile minimum radius, scale optional);

8. Land use and existing zoning of the proposed subdivision and the adjacent land;

9. Streets, street names, right of way and roadway widths, including adjoining streets or roadways;

10. Lot lines, dimensions and numbers, and the total number of lots by block;

11. Contours, shown at five foot (5′) intervals where land slope is greater than ten percent (10%) and at two foot (2′) intervals where land slope is ten percent (10%) or less, with an established bench mark, including location and elevation;

12. Site report as required by the appropriate health district where individual wells or septic tanks are proposed;

13. Any proposed or existing utilities, including, but not limited to, storm and sanitary sewers, irrigation laterals, ditches, drainages, bridges, culverts, water mains, fire hydrant, electric power lines, gas lines, cable lines, and wastewater lines;

14. Any dedications to the public and/or easements, together with a statement of location, dimensions, and purpose of such;

15. If a project is to be constructed/developed in phases, then the overall phasing shall be indicated in a detail on the preliminary plat, but the preliminary plat shall focus on the current phase of development being sought in the application.

16. Copy of any proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions or, if none, a statement that none are proposed;

17. Any additional required information for special developments as specified in chapter 6 of this title (such as for RV Parks, Cemeteries, Large Scale Developments, etc).

18. Statement as to whether or not a variance will be requested with respect to any provision of this title describing the particular provision, the variance requested, and the reasons therefor.

E. Preliminary Plat Fee: At the time of submission of an application for a preliminary plat a nonrefundable fee be paid, the amount which shall be set by resolution of the Council. There shall be no additional fee for the combining of the preliminary and final plats.

F. Submission Requirements: The Applicant shall have submitted the required preliminary plat and required supplemental material, and required fee to the Mayor’s office before scheduling and noticing a regular Council meeting.

G. Public Notification:

1. Posting Notice: For parcesl larger than five (5) acres, City will post a reasonable number of notices on or near the subject property under consideration to be subdivided. The location of the notices shall be on the closest public road(s), in visible locations, surrounding the subject property and erected at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Council’s meeting. Applicant shall be responsible to reimburse City for actual cost of posting notice.

2. Mailed Notice: City shall give actual written notice to every person residing within three hundred feet (300′) of any border of the proposed subdivision at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Council’s meeting. Applicant shall be responsible to reimburse City for actual cost of mailing notice.

3. Published Notice: City shall publish notice at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Council’s meeting and upload to its website. Applicant shall be responsible to reimburse City for actual cost of publishing notice.

H. Council Action: At the next regularly scheduled Council meeting, the applicant shall present the preliminary plat for action. The Council may approve, approve conditionally, disapprove, or table the preliminary plat for additional information. The action, and the reasons for such action, shall be stated in writing by the Council and forwarded to the applicant.

I. Reconsideration: An applicant or affected person who appeared in person or in writing before the Council may, within fifteen (15) days of the Council’s action, submit a written request to the city clerk for the Council to reconsider its action. The Council shall respond in writing within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the request, either modifying its original action or affirming it.

J. Approval Period: Failure to record a final plat within one (1) year after action by the Council shall cause all approvals of said preliminary plat to be null and void, unless an extension of time is applied for prior to the expiration date and granted by the Council. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-3-4: FINAL PLAT:

A. Application: After the approval or conditional approval of the preliminary plat, the applicant may cause the subdivision, or any part thereof, to be surveyed and a final plat prepared in accordance with the approved preliminary plat. The applicant shall submit to the council the following:

1. An original of the final plat that conforms to the approved preliminary plat under 9-3-3.

2. Verification that the engineer construction plans have been approved by the City, expressly including the Clerk and Building Official.

B. Content Of Final Plat: The final plat shall include and be in compliance with all items required under Idaho Code, 50-1304, which includes provisions such as being drawn to a scale to ensure clarity of lines and notations, using permanent ink or transfer process, type and size of paper/film. The final plat application packet shall include at least the following:

1. Written application for approval of such final plat as stipulated by the Council;

2. Proof of current ownership of the real property included in the proposed final plat;

3. Such other and further information as the Council may deem necessary including consents;

4. Conform with the approved preliminary plat and meeting all requirements or conditions of the Council;

5. Conform to all requirements and provisions of this title; and

6. Conform to local standards and acceptable engineering practices.

C. Council Review: The Council shall review the final plat for compliance with the approved or conditionally approved preliminary plat. If the Council determines that there is a substantial difference between the final plat and what was considered as the preliminary plat, or that conditions of preliminary approval have not been met, the Council may require that the final plat be resubmitted in the same manner as required in the preliminary plat process.

D. Agency Review: The Mayor or the Mayor’s designee may transmit a copy of the final plat, or other document(s) submitted, for review and comment to such departments, agencies, districts, or others as deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the preliminary plat and all other conditions previously set. Such agency review shall also include the construction standards of improvements, compliance with health standards, an opinion of cost for all improvements, and the legal review of the performance bond to be issued to the City under section 9-3-5 of this chapter. The Mayor or the Mayor’s designee shall report the results of this review to the Council.

E. Council Action: At its next meeting following receipt of any agency review under subsection D of this section, the Council shall consider the record, together with findings and comments from concerned persons and agencies, and shall approve, approve conditionally, disapprove, or table the final plat for additional information. Approval shall require that the final plat conform to the requirements of this title applicable at the time of approval of the preliminary plat, to all conditions of preliminary approval, and to the requirements of Idaho law.

F. Approval Period: Final plat and covenants, if any, shall be filed by the applicant with the County Recorder within ninety (90) days after written approval by the Council; otherwise, such approval shall become null and void unless prior to said expiration date an extension of time is applied for and granted by the Council.

G. Prior to recording the final subdivision plat, the applicant shall submit to the Mayor’s office:

1. Approved copies of the final construction plans and specifications for streets, water, wastewater, stormwater, parks, gravity irrigation and pressure irrigation systems. All plans and specifications shall have sufficient detail, written information, vertical and horizontal dimensions to accurately locate the proposed improvements in the field and determine their relationship to other improvements. The City Building Official shall establish standards.

2. Financial guarantee of improvements pursuant to section 9-3-5 of this chapter.

3. Certification of water and wastewater plan approval from the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.

4. Certification and signature of the Mayor or Building Official verifying that the subdivision meets the City requirements and has been approved by the Council.

5. If required for purposes of an allowed well and/or septic system, certification and signature of local or State health agency that all health requirements have been complied with or the required sanitary restriction set forth in title 50, chapter 13, Idaho Code has been placed thereon.

6. Street and utility plan approval from the Idaho Transportation Department or Minidoka Highway District, as required.

7. Gravity or other irrigation system plan approval from the Bureau of Reclamation or Minidoka Irrigation District, as required.

8. An executed developer’s agreement, if required by the City.

9. A recorded or recordable warranty deed or other valid and duly executed instrument of transfer to the City of Minidoka for surface or groundwater water rights for the land described on the plat, including the transfer of the water rights shares in any irrigation district where the land is located, unless otherwise agreed to between the City and the developer.

10. Signature on the plat of the Mayor’s office verifying that all conditions for approval of a final plat have been met as required either by a developer’s agreement, other City requirements or both. Upon approval of the final plat by the Council, and compliance with the foregoing then the applicant shall deliver the final plat to the County Recorder for recording.

H. Method of Recording:

1. Once Council has approved the proposed final plat, applicant shall prepare a hard copy of the final plat under Idaho Code 50-1304 and Minidoka County requirements.

2. Applicant is responsible to acquire each required signature on the plat and then record the plat with the Minidoka Recorder Office.

3. Applicant is responsible to provide an electronic copy of the recorded plat with instrument number listed to City. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-3-5: GUARANTEE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS:

A. Financial Guarantee Arrangements: In lieu of the actual installation of required public improvements before recording of the final plat, the Council may permit the subdivider to execute a trust and escrow agreement and record a notice prohibiting the sale of an undeveloped lot without a recorded developer’s agreement between the subdivider and the City relating to that lot, or to provide a financial guarantee of performance in one or a combination of the following arrangements for those requirements which are over and beyond the requirements of any other agency responsible for the administration, operation and maintenance of the applicable public improvement:

1. Surety Bond:

a. Bond: The bond shall accrue to the City covering construction, operation and maintenance of the specific public improvement.

b. Amount: The bond shall be in an amount equal to one hundred ten percent (110%) of the total estimated cost for completing construction of the specific public improvements, as estimated by the developer’s consulting engineer and approved by the City Engineer.

c. Term Length: The term length in which the bond is in force, for the duration of that phase of the project, shall be for a period to be specified by the Council for the specific public improvement.

d. Bonding Or Surety Company: The bond shall be with a bonding or surety company authorized to do business in the State of Idaho, acceptable to the Council.

e. Cancellation Of Bond: Cancellation of the bond voids approval of the final plat; and no building permits may be issued for any further construction in the subdivision.

2. Cash Deposit, Certified Check, Negotiable Bond Or Irrevocable Bank Letter Of Credit:

a. Treasurer, Escrow Agent Or Trust Company: A cash deposit, certified check, negotiable bond or an irrevocable bank letter of credit, such surety acceptable by the Council, shall be deposited with an escrow agent or trust company.

b. Dollar Value: The dollar value of the cash deposit, certified check, negotiable bond or irrevocable bank letter of credit shall be equal to one hundred ten percent (110%) of the estimated cost of construction for the specific public improvement, as estimated by the developer’s consulting engineer approved by the Mayor or Building Official.

c. Escrow Time: The escrow time for the cash deposit, certified check, negotiable bond or irrevocable bank letter of credit shall be until completed and accepted by the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee.

d. Progressive Payment: In the case of cash deposits or certified checks, an agreement between the Council and the subdivider may provide for progressive payment out of the cash deposit or reduction of the certified check, negotiable bond or irrevocable bank letter of credit, to the extent of the cost of the completed portion of the public improvement, in accordance with a previously entered into agreement.

e. Removal Of The Cash Deposit: Removal of the cash deposit by anyone other than the City, revocation of the letter of credit, cancellation or removal of the certified check, negotiable bond or such surety allowed by the City, voids approval of the final plat; and no building permits may be issued for any further construction in the subdivision.

B. Conditional Approval Of Final Plat: With respect to financial guarantees, the approval of all final subdivision plats shall be conditioned on the accomplishment of one of the following:

1. The construction of improvements required by this title shall have been completed by the subdivider and approved by the City Engineer.

2. Surety acceptable to the Council shall have been filed in the form of a cash deposit, certified check, negotiable bond, irrevocable bank letter of credit or surety bond.

C. Developer’s Agreement: Unless waived by the City Council, before approving a final plat and construction plans and specifications for public improvements, an agreement between the developer or subdivider and the Council shall be made to provide for checking or inspecting the construction and its conformity to the submitted plans. The owner, if different from the developer or subdivider, shall be made a party to the agreement.

D. Action In Case Of Failure To Complete The Construction Of A Public Improvement: In the event the subdivider shall fail to complete such work within the period of time as required by the conditions of the guarantee or as otherwise agreed for the completion of public improvements the City may proceed to have such work completed, or in the sole discretion of the City, return any or all of the subdivision back to its condition as it more or less was prior to any plat approval or other development. In order to accomplish this, the Council shall reimburse itself for the cost and expense thereof by appropriating the cash deposit, certified check, irrevocable bank letter of credit, or negotiable bond which the subdivider may have deposited in lieu of a surety bond, or may take such steps as may be necessary to require performance by the bonding or surety company, and as included in a written agreement as above provided. In addition to all other remedies, the City will not issue further building permits for the subdivision until the improvements are provided or the matter is otherwise resolved. If no improvements have been made, the City may void the approval of the final plat.

E. Security: The City will hold ten percent (10%) of security for a two (2) year warranty period from date of acceptance of said improvements. At the completion of the two (2) year warranty period a final inspection will be conducted. Any noted deficiencies in said final inspections must be corrected prior to the release of the remaining security held by the City. Balance of security will be paid within thirty (30) days of acceptance by City. Interest will not be paid on any security held by the City.

F. Final Plat And Covenants: Final plat and covenants, if any, shall be filed by the subdivider/developer with the County Recorder within ninety (90) days after written approval by the Council; otherwise, such approval shall become null and void unless prior to said expiration date an extension of time is applied for and granted by the council. No building permits may be issued for the subdivision until such recording has occurred. A copy of the recorded plat, as recorded, shall be given by the developer to the City. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4: DESIGN STANDARDS:

9-4-1: MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRED:

All plans submitted to the provisions of this title, and all subdivisions, improvements and facilities done, constructed or made in accordance with said provisions shall fully comply with the minimum design standards set forth hereinafter in this chapter; provided, however, that any higher standards adopted by any highway district, state highway department or health agency shall prevail over those set forth herein. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-2: DEDICATION:

Arterial and collector streets shall be dedicated to the public in all cases; in general, all other streets shall also be dedicated to public use. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-3: LOCATION:

Street and road location shall conform to the following:

A. Street Location And Arrangements: When a major street plan or comprehensive development plan has been adopted, subdivision streets shall conform to such plans;

B. Local Or Minor Streets: Shall be so arranged as to discourage their use by through traffic;

C. Street Continuation And Extension: The arrangement of streets shall provide for the continuation of existing streets from adjoining areas into new subdivisions unless otherwise approved by the council and the highway district or department having jurisdiction over such streets;

D. Stub Streets: Where adjoining areas are not subdivided, the arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall be such that said streets extend to the boundary line of the tract to make provisions for the future extension of said streets into adjacent areas. A reserve strip may be required and held in public ownership;

E. Relation To Topography: Streets shall be arranged in proper relation to topography so as to result in usable lots, safe streets and acceptable gradients;

F. Alleys: Alleys shall be provided in multiple-dwelling or commercial subdivisions unless other provisions are made for service access and off street loading and parking. Dead end alleys shall be prohibited in all cases;

G. Frontage Roads: Where a subdivision abuts or contains an arterial street, it may be required in the discretion of the council that there be frontage roads approximately parallel to and on each side of such arterial street, and that there be such other treatment as is necessary for the adequate protection of residential properties and to separate through traffic from local traffic;

H. Cul-De-Sac Streets: Cul-de-sac streets are allowed when circumstances require, in the discretion of the city. When allowed, a cul-de-sac shall have a turnaround at the end of at least one hundred feet (100′) in diameter;

I. Half Streets: Half streets shall be prohibited except where unusual circumstances make such necessary to the reasonable development of a tract in conformance with this title and where satisfactory assurance for dedication of the remaining part of the street is provided. Whenever a tract to be subdivided bordering on an existing half or partial street, the other part of the street shall be dedicated with such tract; and

J. Private Streets: Private streets and roads shall be prohibited except within planned unit developments. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-4: SPECIFICATIONS:

A. Street Right of Way Widths: Street and road right of way widths shall conform to the adopted Transportation Master Plan or comprehensive development plan, Typical Sections, and the rules of the state department of highways and the highway district or department having jurisdiction; minimum right of way standards are as follows:

Street TypeWidthWidth Of Pavement
Collector Street80 feet50 feet (lip to lip)
Minor Collector Street66 feet38 feet
Residential/Local Street50 to 66 feetVaries 34 to 38 feet

B. Street Grades: Street grades shall not exceed nine percent (9%) on either Local or Collector streets, and no street grade shall be less than five-tenths feet (5/10′) per one hundred feet (100′) or o.5% grade.

C. Vertical Street Alignment: Minimum sight distances shall be two hundred feet (200′) for Residential streets and three hundred feet (300′) for other streets. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-5: STREET NAMES:

The naming of streets shall conform to the following: street names shall not duplicate any existing street name except where a new street is a continuation of an existing street; street names that may be spelled differently but sound the same as existing streets shall not be used. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-6: INTERSECTIONS:

Intersections shall conform to the following:

A. Angle Of Intersection: Streets shall intersect at ninety degrees (90°) or as closely thereto as possible, and in no case, shall streets intersect at less than seventy-five degrees (75°);

B. Number Of Streets: No more than two (2) streets shall cross at any one intersection;

C. “T” Intersections: “T” intersections may be used wherever such design will not unduly restrict the free movement of traffic, Offset “T” intersections shall be far enough apart to facilitate storage for left turning traffic movements;

D. Vertical Alignment of Intersection: A nearly flat grade with appropriate drainage slopes is desirable within intersections. This flat section shall extend fifty feet (50′) to one hundred feet (100′) each way from the center of the intersection. An allowance of two percent (2%) maximum intersection grade in flat or rolling terrain, and four percent (4%) in hilly terrain, will be permitted. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-7: PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS:

Right of way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks shall be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the right of way shall be at least ten feet (10′) wide and shall extend entirely through the block. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-8: EASEMENTS:

Unobstructed utility easements shall be provided along front lot lines, rear lot lines and side lot lines when necessary; total easement width shall be not less than twelve feet (12′) where lots adjoin. Unobstructed drainageway easements shall be provided as required by the council. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-9: BLOCKS:

A. Every block shall be so designed as to provide two (2) tiers of lots, except where lots back on to an arterial street, natural feature or subdivision boundary; blocks shall not be less than three hundred feet (300′) long in most all cases.

B. The length, width and shape of blocks shall be determined with due regard to adequate sites suitable to the special needs of the type of use contemplated; the zoning requirements as to lot size and dimensions; the need for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic; and the limitations and opportunities of topography. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-10: LOTS:

Lots shall conform to the following:

A. Residential Lot Minimums: Lots in residential low subdivisions shall have the following minimum sizes and characteristics:

1. Lots along roadways;

a. Six thousand one hundred (6,100) square feet;

b. Minimum road frontage length of sixty-five feet (65′).

2. Lots at the inside corner of an intersection or bend in road; a Seven thousand two hundred and twenty (7,200) square feet;

b. Minimum road frontage length of sixty-five feet (65′) along both roads.

3. Lots at the outside corner of a sharp bend in a road, or at the end of a cul-de-sac;

a. Six thousand one hundred (6,100) square feet;

b. Minimum road frontage length of forty feet (40′);

c. Sharp bend is one where the road centerline angle changes by fifty degrees (50°) or more.

B. Lot Lines: Side lot lines should be essentially at right angles to straight streets and generally conform to the radius of curved streets;

C. Corner Lots: Inside corner lots shall have sufficient extra width to facilitate the building setback from both streets;

D. Uninhabitable Areas: Land subject to flooding or which shall otherwise be deemed to be uninhabitable shall not be platted for residential purposes or for any other uses that may increase or create a danger to health, life or property or which may increase or create a flood hazard. Such land within a subdivision shall be set aside for other uses such as parks or other open space;

E. Backup Lots: Lots shall back into such features as freeways, collector streets, shopping centers or industrial properties, except where there is a marginal access street. Such lots shall contain a landscaped easement along the rear at least twenty feet (20′) wide in addition to the utility easement; the restricted access to the collector street will reduce noise effects and help protect outdoor living areas. Lots extending through a block and having frontage on two (2) local streets are to be discouraged and may be prohibited by the council;

F. Lot Frontage: All rectangular lots shall have at least sixty-five feet (65′) of frontage upon a publicly dedicated streets. Exceptions may be granted by the Council for an approved planned unit development;

G. Future Arrangements: Where parcels of land are subdivided into unusually large lots (such as when large lots are approved for septic tank operations) the parcels shall be divided, where feasible, so as to allow for future resubdividing into smaller parcels. Lot arrangements shall allow for the ultimate extension of adjacent streets through the middle of wide blocks. Whenever such future subdividing or lot splitting is contemplated the plan thereof shall be approved by the council prior to the taking of such action; and

I. Further Subdivision; Variances:

1. Further Subdivision Of Lots: In order to protect the easements, traffic density and utility service plans of the city and the general plans of ingress and egress from a subdivision, the platted lots, as depicted on the final plat and as approved by the city, shall not be further subdivided without a submission of an amended subdivision plat and conforming with the requirements of this title for submission and approval of amended plats. Each final subdivision plat shall prominently display the following legend prior to approval: Important notice to owners and purchasers of lots in this subdivision: It is unlawful for any owner of a lot in this subdivision to further subdivide any lot in this subdivision without further formal compliance with the requirements of the City of Minidoka’s subdivision ordinance for approval of amended subdivision plats. The terms “further subdivide” shall include all definitions in the Minidoka City Code and Idaho state law, as well as any form of transfer of ownership of less than the entire lot or interest in a lot to any other person or entity, other than the granting of lawful and appropriate easements, lawful pledges or liens.

2. Variance To Prohibition Of Further Subdivision Of Lots: A lot owner who, because the prohibition against further subdivision, is placed in a position of hardship due to the unique circumstances of the lot in question as defined in title 8 of this code, may make written application to the city for a variance in the same manner and providing the same information as required in title 8 of this code. In addition thereto, the application shall provide the following:

a.    An accurate survey with the proposed subdivision of the lot in question depicted thereon;

b.    An accurate depiction of changes, additions or deletions of utilities easements;

c. A verified statement why application for an amended subdivision plat is either not feasible or impractical which shall include a statement as to why the request either does or does not affect other lot owners in the subdivisions and whether, in the opinion of the applicant, there are other lots in the subdivision that require similar variance or further subdivisions.

3. Procedure: The procedure for granting such a variance shall be as follows: The written petition, accompanied with payment of a fee in the amount set by resolution of the council, shall first be presented to the city council. The council shall then hold a public hearing on the petition, after giving notice by mail to the last known address to all owners of lots and persons using or occupying buildings or residences within the subdivision as well as giving notice as provided in subsection 9-3-3G of this title. If the council determines that it will waive the requiring of submission and approval of an amended subdivision plat, then it shall refer the matter to the mayor and city council. The procedure set forth in title 8 of this code, shall then apply to the consideration and granting of such application for variance by the mayor and city council. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-11: PLANTING STRIPS AND RESERVE STRIPS:

A. Planting Strips: Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screens shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20′) wide, and shall not be a part of the normal roadway right of way or utility easement.

B.    Reserve Strips:

1.        Reserve Strips, Private: Privately held reserve strips controlling access to streets shall be prohibited.

2. Reserve Strips, Public: A one foot (1′) reserve may be required to be placed at the end or along “stub”, “dead end”, or half streets which terminate at subdivision boundaries. These reserves shall be deeded in fee simple to the city for future street purposes. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-12: PUBLIC SITES AND OPEN SPACES:

Public sites and open spaces shall conform to the following:

A. Public Uses: Where a proposed park, playground, school or other public use shown on the comprehensive development plan is located in whole or part within a subdivision, a suitable area for this purpose shall be dedicated to the public or reserved for public purchase. If within two (2) years of plat recording, the purchase is not agreed on, the reservation shall be canceled or shall automatically cease to exist; and

B. Natural Features: Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable assets) shall be preserved, insofar as possible, in the design of the subdivision. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-4-13: LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS:

Large scale developments shall be governed by the following provisions:

A. Classification:

1. Large Scale Residential Developments: developments with 30 or more dwelling units. For example, 15 duplexes, 30 single family homes, or 8 four-plexes.

2. Large Scale Commercial Developments: developments with over 62,000 SF of warehouse floor space, or over 20,000 SF of retail/office space, or a combination of warehouse, retail, shop, and office space of over 62,000 SF.

B. Open Spaces and Public Sites Guidelines:

1. Large Scale Residential Developments shall provide one or more of the following:

a. Trails and Open Spaces: Minimum of 5% of the gross development land shall be dedicated to access to, parking for, and open space/trail area. Trails are to be at least twenty-five (25) feet wide between fences to avoid a narrow corridor. Trails and open spaces are to be landscaped. Park areas that do not have playground equipment, shade structures/pavilions, sports fields, etc. are considered open space.

b. Sports Fields: Minimum of 4% of the gross development land shall be dedicated to access to, parking for, and the sports field area. Sports fields include developed facilities for baseball, soccer, football, and similar sports.

c. Parks: Minimum of 3% of the gross development land shall be dedicated to access to, parking for, and the developed park area. Parks shall have picnic areas with shade structures, playground equipment, fencing, hard surfaces, walkway, etc. The amount of playground equipment shall be proportional to the size of the park area. Parks where at least 55% of the playground equipment and play areas are ADA accessible may have the percentage of the gross development area required for park dedication reduced to 2%.

d. Sports Courts: Minimum of 2% of the gross development land shall be dedicated to access to, parking for, and the sports courts area. Sports courts include all-weather hard-surfaced fenced areas for tennis, pickleball, basketball, and similar sports.

e. Recreation Centers/Club Houses: Minimum of 1.5% of the gross development land shall be dedicated to access to, parking for, and the developed recreation center/club house area.

f. Combination of two or more of items A through E may be acceptable, the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee shall determine the amount of minimum percentage of gross development land is required to satisfy the requirements of this section.

g. The residential developer may request the City consider receiving and maintaining open spaces and public sites constructed by a developer through dedication and acceptance as part of the platting process and through a Developer Agreement.

2. Large Scale Commercial Developments shall provide one or more of the following:

a. Landscape areas along the borders of the development and around parking/access areas. Minimum of 2% of gross development land shall be dedicated to landscaping areas.

b. Trails/Greenbelts running through the development and connecting to other adjoining properties and public park space. Minimum of 1% of gross development land shall be dedicated to trails and greenbelts. Trails and greenbelts shall be at least thirty (30) feet wide and landscaped. Landscaping within public right-of-way does not count toward fulfilling this requirement. Greenbelts and trails shall be arranged to periodically be adjacent to publicly accessible parking areas to facilitate public use of greenbelts and trails.

c. Cash contribution to City for improvements to other existing City parks that are within 1.5 miles of the proposed large scale commercial development. Cash contributions shall be roughly equivalent to the value of the commercial land with its landscaping improvements that would have otherwise been dedicated by the development. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-5: IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:

9-5-1: PURPOSE:

It is the purpose of this chapter to establish and define the public improvements which will be required to be constructed by the subdivider as conditions for final plat approval and also to outline the procedures and responsibilities of the subdivider and the various public officials and agencies concerned with the administration, planning design, construction, and financing of public facilities and to further establish procedures for assuring compliance with these requirements. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-5-2: RESPONSIBILITY FOR PLANS:

It shall be the responsibility of the subdivider of every proposed subdivision to have prepared by a registered engineer, a complete set of construction plans, including profiles, cross section, specifications, and other supporting data, for all required public streets, utilities and other facilities. Such construction plans shall be based on preliminary plans which have been approved with the preliminary plat, and shall be prepared in conjunction with the final plat. Construction plans are subject to approval by the city engineer and other responsible public agencies. All construction plans shall be prepared in accordance with the public agencies’ standards or specifications. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-5-3: REQUIRED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS:

Every subdivider shall be required to install the following public and other improvements in accordance with the conditions and specifications as follows:

A. Monuments: Monuments shall be set in accordance with section 50-1313, Idaho Code.

B. Streets And Alleys: All streets and alleys shall be constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications adopted by the council. Vertical curbs and gutters shall be constructed on arterial streets.

C. Curbs And Gutters: Curbs and gutters shall be required on minor streets and shall be constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications adopted by the council.

D. Installation Of Public Utilities: Underground utilities are recommended and may be required by the council in areas where overhead facilities would not be compatible with the surrounding properties.

E. Driveways: All driveway openings in curbs shall be as specified by the Building Official, highway district or state highway department.

F. Water Supply System: When a proposed subdivision is to be serviced by a public water supply system fire hydrants and other required water system appurtenances shall be provided by the subdivider. If there is no existing or accessible public water supply system, the subdivider shall be required to install a water supply system for the common use of the lots within the subdivision as approved by state department of environmental community services. Individual wells may be permitted in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate health district.

G. Sanitary Sewer System: When a proposed subdivision is to be served by a public sanitary sewage system, sanitary sewers and other required appurtenances thereto shall be provided by the subdivider as approved by the state department of environmental and community services. Where it is determined in the judgment of the council, based upon the advice of the appropriate health district, that a subdivision cannot be feasibly connected with an existing public or private sewer system or that a public or private sewer system not be provided for the subdivision, that an approved disposal system may be authorized which shall comply with the requirements of the appropriate health district.

H. Sidewalks And Pedestrian Walkways: Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the street. Where the average width of lots, as measured at the frontage line or at the building setback line, is over one hundred feet (100′), sidewalks on one side may be required by the Council. Pedestrian walkways, when required, shall have easements at least ten feet (10′) in width and include a concrete walk at least five feet (5′) in width, located generally along the centerline of the easement, dedicated as a public pedestrian walkway. Sidewalks shall be unobstructed by poles, posts, mailboxes, or other obstacles which impede the potential flow and safety of the walk or way. Sidewalks and crosswalks shall be constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications as adopted by the Council.

I. Greenbelt: Greenbelts or landscaping screening may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent major arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights-of-way or other features. Subdivision plats shall show the location of any greenbelt areas.

J. Street Lighting: Streetlights shall be required to be installed at intersections throughout the subdivision. In these cases a subdivider shall conform to the requirements of the City and the public utility providing such lighting.

K. Bicycle Paths: Bicycle paths should be considered in all developments and may be required by the council.

L. Responsibility For Private Improvements And Public Utilities: It shall be the responsibility of the subdivider to arrange and provide for the development, installation, construction or other improvement of private facilities and public utilities within and for the subdivision in accordance with applicable standards and requirements.

M. Responsibilities For The Construction Of Public Works: The scope of this section is to define the respective areas of responsibility of the subdivider and the City relative to the installation, construction, or other improvements of public works en route to and within the boundaries of a subdivision. In certain instances, the City may require formal written agreements with the subdivider that more fully and specifically describe their respective obligations and responsibilities.

N. General: It shall be the responsibility of the subdivider to complete at his sole expense all the development and construction of public works for and within his subdivision except as specifically provided otherwise to be the obligation and responsibility of the City, or as may be accepted by the City as being within the spirit and intent of its responsibilities.

O. Completion Of Public Works: The subdivider shall complete the installation or construction of all the different phases of public works for which he is responsible before the City will accept any of them. This requirement may be satisfied by completion of a stage if a staged development is called for in the approved development plan.

P. Guarantee Of Completion: Until the public works for which the subdivider is responsible are complete, or an acceptable stage of the development is completed, the City will issue no building permit for private construction therein unless a satisfactory performance bond or other suitable guarantee of performance acceptable to the City is provided by the subdivider.

Q. Evidence Of Completion: The subdivider shall notify the City in writing when the public works for which he is responsible have been completed. The Mayor or the Mayor’s designee shall also certify in writing, a copy of which shall be sent to the subdivider, that the said public works have been inspected by him or his authorized representative, and that the said public works have been completed in accordance with applicable standards and specifications. As built construction plans shall be submitted to the City upon completion.

R. Acceptance Of Public Works: Compliance with the foregoing provisions shall constitute the City’s acceptance of the public works. The City shall thereby accept said public works and be responsible for their operation and maintenance in accordance with City policies.

S. Streets:

1. Subdivider Requirements: The subdivider shall perform, install, construct, or otherwise complete at his sole expense the following items relative to street improvements within the boundaries of the subdivision:

a. Route (or boundary) surveys of the dedicated rights-of-way.

b. Construction surveys of line and grade.

c. Installation of sidewalks, if applicable.

d. Installation of curb and gutters, if applicable.

e. Preparation of the subgrade.

f. Installation of the roadway base course.

g. Inspection of all phases of construction to assure compliance with applicable standards and specifications.

h. Installation of a crushed gravel leveling course to be used as a temporary wearing surface until a permanent asphalt pavement is installed.

i. Installation of asphalt pavement shall be installed following the installation of curbs and gutters.

j. Adequate runoff, storm sewers, pipes, culverts, ditches or other drainage facilities as designated by the council.

2. City Requirements: The city shall perform, install, construct, or otherwise complete at its sole expense the following items relative to street improvements within the boundaries of the subdivision.

a. Installation of traffic control signs and signals and street name signs.

b. The city shall also improve to the extent it deems suitable, subject to budgetary limitations, such existing right of way as it considers necessary to provide adequate access to the subdivision.

T. Sanitary Sewage Collection System: The subdivider shall be responsible for the installation of a sanitary sewage collection system within the boundaries of the subdivision. The subdivider shall perform, install, construct or otherwise complete at his sole expense the following items relative to sanitary sewers:

1. Preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of the sanitary sewer system, including extensions from the existing collection system, and the approval of said plans and specifications by the Idaho department of health and welfare.

2. Construction surveys of line and grade within the subdivision.

3. Installation of the sewer system within the subdivision, including sewers, manholes and other appurtenances, and, if applicable, sewage pumping stations.

4. If sewer mains are located in a dedicated street, installation of a sewer service line to the property line of each lot.

5. Inspection of construction to assure compliance with the plans, specifications, and applicable standards.

6. Installation of a sewer extension from the existing collection system to a designated point of connection near the subdivision. Connections to the sewers will be in accordance with existing procedures and the policies of the city; and the subdivider will be liable for the payment of sewer assessment and hookup charges as provided by city ordinances.

U. Water Distribution System: The subdivider shall be responsible for the installation of a culinary water distribution system within the boundaries of the subdivision. The subdivider shall perform, install, construct, or otherwise complete at his sole expense the following items relative to a culinary water distribution system:

1. Preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of the water distribution system, and the approval of said plans and specifications by the Idaho department of health and welfare.

2. Construction surveys of line and grade within the subdivision.

3. Installation of the water distribution system within the subdivision, including water lines, control valves, fire hydrants, and appurtenant facilities.

4. If water mains are located in a dedicated street, installation of a water service line to the property line of each lot.

5. Inspection of construction to assure compliance with the plans, specifications, and applicable standards.

6. Installation of a water line extension or extensions as indicated above. Connections to the water mains shall be in accordance with existing procedures and policies of the city, and the subdivider shall be liable for the payment of water assessment and hookup charges as provided by city ordinances.

V. Reimbursement For Oversizing: In the event the city requires the subdivider to ins all oversized pipelines or other excess facilities to make provisions for present or future service needs in excess of the requirements for the subdivision, the city shall reimburse the subdivider for the additional costs of material and installation resulting therefrom.

W. Building Line Setback: In all new subdivisions the building line setback shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20′) from the property line. In the event that a new subdivision is located along a street with existing residences, the setback line shall be not less than other structures along the street and preferably should be set back as an average of the existing structures.

X. Side And Rear Lot Line Clearance: In all new subdivisions no building of any nature shall be placed or constructed nearer than five feet (5′) of the property line. Where utility rights of way or other rights of way or easements are provided along property lines and lot lines no structure of any nature shall be permitted in such rights of way or easements, except for the purpose for which they are provided. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-6: SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTS:

9-6-1: PURPOSE:

The purpose of this chapter is to identify the various types of special developments that normally pose special concerns to the council and elected officials when reviewing and acting upon subdivision requests. Therefore, this chapter outlines the general plan submittal requirements and design standards that shall be taken into consideration when acting on special developments. The provisions of this chapter are in addition to the plan requirements and design standards that are required by chapters 3 and 4 of this title. The required information shall be submitted to the council with the preliminary plat. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-6-2: PLANNED UNIT AND CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENTS:

A. Site Development Plan: The developer shall provide the council with a colored rendering of adequate scale to show the completed development that will include at least the following:

1. Architect style and building design;

2. Building materials and color;

3. Landscaping;

4. Screening;

5. Garbage areas;

6. Parking; and

7. Open space.

B. Private Streets: Private street construction standards shall be based upon recommendations from the Mayor or Building Official and the council. Adequate construction standards may vary depending on the size of the development and the demands placed on such improvements.

C. Homeowners’ Association: Homeowners’ association bylaws and other similar deed restrictions, which provide for the control and maintenance of all common areas, recreation facilities or open space shall meet with the approval of the council. Any and all powers as specified in such agreements may be required to also be assigned to the jurisdictional agency to ensure continued and adequate maintenance of all such common areas, recreational facilities and open spaces, ability to assess property for delinquencies and enforcement of motor vehicle speed to the best interest of the owners involved and of the general public.

D. Storage Areas: Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers and trailers. For typical residential development, one adequate space shall be provided every three (3) living units. This may be reduced by the council if there is a showing that the needs of a particular development are less.

E. Parking Space: One additional parking space beyond that which is required by the zoning title may be required for every three (3) dwelling units to accommodate visitor parking.

F. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building shall be provided, size and location to be determined by the type and service needed for the necessary repair and maintenance of all common areas.

G. Open Space: The location of open space shall be appropriate to the development and shall be of such shape and area to be usable and convenient to the residents of the development.

H. Control During Development: Single ownership or control during development shall be required and a time limit may be imposed to guarantee the development is built and constructed as planned. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-6-3: CEMETERIES:

A. Function: The developer shall provide the council with written documentation that will sufficiently explain if the proposed cemetery will be used for either human or animal remains and the functions that are anticipated on the property.

B. Compliance With The Idaho Code: The developer shall submit a written statement that has been prepared by an attorney that adequately assures the compliance of the proposed cemetery with the procedural platting requirements that are outlined in title 27, Idaho Code. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-6-4: MOBILE HOME PARKS:

A. General: Mobile home parks shall in general be treated the same as any residential subdivision, subject to any special requirements set forth in the zoning title and also subject to the following special requirements.

B. Special Requirements: Mobile home parks shall be subject to the following special requirements:

1. Developed as a planned unit development with a minimum lot area for the planned development of two (2) acres;

2. Essential community facilities and services for the type of development under consideration is available, or provisions shall be made to assure that these facilities will be provided;

3. The site shall be suitable for residential development and not be subject to hazards such as insect or rodent infection, objectionable smoke, noxious odors, unusual noise, or the probability of flooding or erosion;

4. Adequacy of provisions for drainage of surface waters and for waste disposal;

5. Protection of existing ground cover;

6. Screening from adjacent areas, other than subdivisions of the same type, by aesthetically acceptable fences, walls, living plant areas, and existing natural or manmade barriers;

7. The width and construction of access streets shall be suitable for the vehicular traffic requirements of the property served. No lot within the development shall have direct vehicular access to a street bordering the development; and

8. Creation of a homeowners’ association to assure that all common open areas are adequately maintained. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-6-5: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS:

A. General: Recreational vehicle parks shall in general be treated the same as any residential subdivision, subject to any special requirements set forth in the zoning title and also subject to the following special requirements.

B. Special Requirements:

1. Recreation vehicle parks shall be developed as a planned unit development with a minimum lot area for the planned development of two (2) acres;

2. Essential community facilities and services for the type of development under consideration shall be included in the plans or there shall be reasonable assurance that the facilities and services are available, or provisions shall be made to assure that these facilities will be provided;

3. There shall be adequate provisions for drainage of surface waters and for waste disposal;

4. There shall be adequate protection of existing ground cover;

5. There shall be adequate screening from adjacent areas, other than subdivisions of the same type, by aesthetically acceptable fences, walls, living plant areas, and existing natural or manmade barriers; and

6. There shall be adequate provision for width and construction of access streets which shall be suitable for the vehicular traffic requirements of the property served. No lot within the development shall have direct vehicular access to a street bordering the development. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-6-6: LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION; REQUIRED INFORMATION:

Due to the impact that large scale development would have on public utilities and services, the developer shall submit the following information along with the preliminary plat:

A. Identification of all public services that would be provided to the development that will occur as a result of the subdivision, such as fire protection, police protection, central water, central sewer, road construction, recreation, maintenance, schools and other;

B. Estimate the public service costs to provide adequate service to the development;

C. Estimate the tax revenue that will be generated from the development; and

D. Public means of financing the services for the development if any public services would not be offset by tax revenue received from the development. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-7: VACATIONS, DEDICATIONS AND VARIANCES:

9-7-1: APPLICATION PROCEDURE:

A. Application: Any property owner desiring to vacate an existing subdivision, public right of way or easement, or desiring to dedicate a street right of way, or easement shall complete and file an application with the council and also file such other applications as are otherwise required by law. These provisions shall not apply to the widening of any street which is shown in the comprehensive development plan, or the dedication of streets, rights of way, or easements to be shown on a recorded plat of a subdivision.

B. Council Action:

1. When considering an application for vacation procedures, the council shall establish a date for a public hearing and give such public notice as required by law. The council may approve, deny or modify the application. Whenever public rights of way or lands are vacated, the council shall provide adjacent property owners with a quitclaim deed for said vacated rights of way in such proportions as are prescribed by law.

2. When considering an application for dedication procedures, the council may approve, deny, or modify the application. When a dedication is approved, the required street improvements shall be constructed or a bond furnished assuring the construction prior to acceptance of the dedication. To complete the acceptance of any dedication of land, the owner shall furnish to the council a deed describing and conveying such lands to be recorded with the county recorder. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-7-2: PURPOSE OF VARIANCES:

The council may grant a variance from the provisions of this title on a finding that undue hardship may result from strict compliance with specific provisions or requirements of the title or that application of such provisions or requirements is impracticable. The council shall only grant variances that it deems necessary to or desirable for the public interest. In making its findings, the council shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of land and the existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons to reside or work in the proposed subdivision, and the probable effect of persons to reside or work in the proposed subdivision, and the probable effect of the proposed subdivision upon traffic conditions in the vicinity. No variance shall be granted unless the council finds after a public hearing:

A. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting said property that the strict application of the provisions of this title would clearly be impracticable, or unreasonable; in such cases, the subdivider shall first state his reasons in writing as to the specific provisions or requirement involved;

B. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which said property is situated;

C. That such variance will not violate the provisions of the Idaho Code; and

D. That such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the interest and purpose of this title and the comprehensive development plan. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-7-3: TOPOGRAPHICAL; PHYSICAL LIMITATION VARIANCE:

Where in the case of a particular proposed subdivision, it can be shown that strict compliance with the requirements of this title would result in extraordinary hardship to the subdivider because of unusual topography, other physical conditions, or other such conditions which are not self-inflicted, or that these conditions would result in inhibiting the achievement of the objectives of this title, the council may grant a variance modification or a waiver of these requirements. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-7-4: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE:

The developer may request a variance from specified portions of this title in the case of a planned unit development. Upon considering the requested variance, the council shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land and existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons to reside or work in the proposed subdivision, the probable effect of the proposed subdivision upon traffic conditions in the vicinity, adequate open space, light, air and other needs. The council’s findings and report to the council shall include whether:

A. The proposed project will constitute a desirable and stable community development and be in compliance with the comprehensive development plan;

B. The proposed project will be in harmony with adjacent areas; and

C. The proposed project will be served with adequate public facilities. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-8: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES:

9-8-1: ENFORCEMENT:

No subdivision plat required by this title or the Idaho Code shall be admitted to the public land records of the, county or recorded by the county recorder, until such subdivision plat has received final approval by the council. No public board, agency, council, official or other authority shall proceed with the construction of or authorize the construction of any of the public improvements required by this title until the final plat has received the approval by the council. (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)

9-8-2: PENALTIES:

Penalties for failure to comply with the provisions of this title shall be as follows: Violation of any of the provisions of this title or failure to comply with any of its requirements shall constitute a misdemeanor. Each day such violation continues shall be considered as a separate offense. The landowner, tenant, subdivider, builder, public official or any other person who commits, participates in, assists in, or maintains such violation may each be found guilty of a separate offense and suffer the penalties herein provided. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the council or any other public official or private citizen from taking such lawful action as is necessary to restrain or prevent any violation of this title or of the Idaho Code.   (Ord. 2026-13, 1 Sep 2026)